期刊文献+

酒石酸布托啡诺与芬太尼在宫颈癌术后镇痛的临床效果对比 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较酒石酸布托啡诺与芬太尼在宫颈癌术后镇痛中应用的临床效果。方法选择70例宫颈癌患者,根据自愿的原则,随机均分为观察组和对照组,观察组患者术后给予酒石酸布托啡诺镇痛,对照组患者术后给予芬太尼镇痛,比较两组患者产术后VAS评分、Ramsay评分和不良反应情况。结果术后5h、10h和15h的VAS评分比较及术后Ramsay评分比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组优于对照组;两组患者术后不良反应情况,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论宫颈癌术后应首选酒石酸布托啡诺镇痛,可提高镇痛效果,且不会增加不良反应。
作者 于文华
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第3期118-119,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘伟,刘淑雨,王寿叶.布托啡诺与芬太尼用于剖宫产术后静脉镇痛的比较[J].滨州医学院学报,2006,29(3):219-220. 被引量:1
  • 2Commiskey S,Fan LW,Hol K,et al.Butorphanol:effects of a prototypical agonist-antagonist analgesic on kappa-opioid receptors[J].J Pharmacol Sci,2005,98(2):109.
  • 3Tanaka S,fan LW,Tien LT,et al.Butorfanol dependence increase hippocampal kappa-opioid receptor gene expression[J].J Neuroosci Res,2005,82(2):255.
  • 4段世明.麻醉药理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.51-58.
  • 5何绍明,周宁,李辉,金利.布托啡诺与芬太尼联合用于术后病人自控静脉镇痛[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):643-644. 被引量:30
  • 6SALO M. Effects of anesthesia and stugery on the immune response[J]. Acta Anesthesio Scand, 1992, 36: 201-220.
  • 7TSI YC, WON SJ, LIN MT. Effects of morpine on immune response in rats with sciatic constriction injury[J]. Pain, 2000, 88:155-160.
  • 8WANG J, CHARBONEAU R, BALASUBRAMANIAN S, et al.Morphine modulates lymph node derived T lymphocyte funeton;role of caspase-3, and nitric oxide[J]. J Leukoe Biol, 2001, 70:527-536.
  • 9YEAGER MP, PROCOPIO MA, DELEO JA, et al. Intravenous fentanyl increases natural killer cell cytotoxicity and circulating CD16 (+) lymphocytes in humans[J]. Anesth & Analg, 2002, 94:94-99.
  • 10KSHATRI AM, MCGARRITY SJ, HAHN MB, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia using ropivacine via an intrathecal catheter[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 1998, 23: 320-322.

共引文献894

同被引文献26

  • 1沈国容,王东明,赵志斌,徐德明.布托啡诺与芬太尼应用于全麻诱导期间呼吸循环变化的临床对照研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2005,34(10):1241-1243. 被引量:18
  • 2Dunteman E. Karanikolas M. Fdos KS Transnasal butorphanol for the treatment of opioidmduced pruritus un- responsive to antihistamines [ J ]. Journal of pain and symptom management, 1996 , 12 ( 4 ) :255-260.
  • 3Halter JB, Pflug AE, Poae D. Mechanisms of plasma cate- cholamine increases during surgical stress in man [ J ]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab , 1997 ,45:936.
  • 4Chandni Sinha, Manpreet Kaur, Ajeet Kumar. Comparative evaluation of midazolam and butorphanol as oral premedication in pediatric patients [ J J. Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. , 2012 ,28 ( 1 ) : 32-35.
  • 5Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Bell C, et al. Premeditation in the United States : A status report [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1997 , 84 (4) :27-32.
  • 6Bhakta P, Ghosh BR, Roy M, et al. Evaluation of Intranasal midazolam for preanasthetic sedation in Paediatric patients [ J]. Indian J Anaesth ,2007 ,51 ( 11 ) : 1-6.
  • 7Lnnqvist PA, Habre W. Midazolam as premedication: Is the emperor naked or just half- dressed? [ J ]. Pediatr Anesth ,2005 ,15(26) :3-5.
  • 8Bergendahl H, Lonnqvist PA, Eksborg S. Clonidine in paediatric anaesthesia: A review of the literature and comparison with benzodiazepines for premedication [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2006 ,50( 1 ) :35-43.
  • 9Schmidt AP, Valinetti EA, Banderira D, et al. Jr Effects of preanesthetic administration of midazolam, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain and anxiety in children [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2007 , 17 ( 6 ) : 67-74.
  • 10Wittles B, glisten B, Faure EA, et al. Opioid antagonist adjuncts to epidural morphine for postcesarean analgesia: maternaloutcomes [ J ]. Anesthanalg, 1993 ,77:925-932.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部