期刊文献+

主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性冠脉综合征的临床应用研究 被引量:5

Primary evaluation to safty and value of IABP in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated with pump failure
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过评估临床疗效、心脏彩超、冠脉造影和脑利钠肽(BNP)的变化,进一步研究主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)合并泵功能衰竭治疗的有效性和安全性。对象2008年1月至2009年5月我院ACS合并泵功能衰竭患者121例,男76例,女45例,年龄40~78岁,平均(67±11)岁,其中急性ST抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)77例、ST不抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI)39例、不稳定性心绞痛(UA)4例,KillipⅡ级40例、KillipⅢ级45例、KillipⅣ级36例,符合IABP治疗适应证、排除禁忌证。方法随机分成IABP组(61例)和对照组(60例),基本药物治疗根据病情使用抗血小板、抗凝、抗心绞痛、抗心律失常、抗心衰(多巴胺、多巴酚丁胺、洋地黄、利尿剂、血管扩张剂等),所有患者均同意行冠脉造影和冠脉介入治疗(PCI),IABP组使用IABP治疗,对照组则无。评估:①临床疗效(心绞痛疗效和泵衰竭疗效)、平均住院日和30d病死率。②冠脉造影检查评估冠脉再通。③心脏彩超测定射血分数(EF值)。④血清脑利钠肽(BNP)变化。⑤IABP并发症。结果 IABP组和对照组比较,两组在治疗前基本资料、心绞痛、泵衰竭和基本治疗均无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后:①心绞痛疗效有效率和泵衰竭疗效有效率分别为94.7%vs81.6%(P<0.05)和85.8%vs61.2%(P<0.01)、住院日8.6dvs11.7d(P<0.01)、30d病死率1.6%(1/61)vs6.7%(4/60)(P<0.001)。②STEMI冠脉造影检查评估冠脉再通率90%(36/40)vs70.3%(26/37)(P<0.01)。③治疗前后EF值分别为35%→58%vs34%→43%,治疗前无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后前者比后者有明显提高(P<0.05)。④BNP治疗前后分别为4893±966→316±91vs4687±912→511±120(ng/L),治疗前无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后前者比后者有显著降低(P<0.01);⑤IABP并发症:明显出血3.2%(2/61)、血肿3.2%(2/61)、肢体血运障碍1.6%(1/61)、相关发热1.6%(1/61)、血小板减少4.8%(3/61),比对照组较多,但经对症处理好转、无严重和不可逆并发症。结论 IABP对ACS合并泵衰竭能够改善血流动力学、增加冠脉血供和增加冠脉再通,明显改善心绞痛和泵功能,临床疗效显著,无严重并发症,安全性较高。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safty,and the result of coronary angiography(CAG) and serum brain natriuretic peptide(BNP) level in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated with pump failure treated with intra aortic balloon pump(IABP).Methods Between January 2008 and May 2009,121 patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) and pump failure were divided into IABP group(61 cases) and the control group(60 cases),respectively.there were 76 mail patiens and 45 femail patiens,while 77 were ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI),35 were Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) and 9 were Unstable angina pectoris(UA).40 patiens fell into Killip rank-Ⅱ,45 patiens fell into iKillip rank-Ⅲ,while 36 pitiens fell into Killip rank-Ⅳ.All of them were suitable for IABP treatment and there was no contraindication.They all received basical treatment,including anti-anginal therapy,anti-pletlet,cholesterol lowing,eatl.All patiens underwent CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).The IABP group were treated with IABP while the control group were not.Evaluations:① Clinical effect(including the effect of angina and pump failure),timing in hospital,death rate in 30 d.② the CAG result after PCI.③ the level of EF measured by cadioultrasound.④ The level of BNP were mesured.Results After treatment,the IABP group were higher significantly than the control group in clinical effect,including the effect of angina and pump failure[94.7% vs 81.6%(P0.01)和85.8% vs 61.2%(P0.01)].In timing hospital,the result was 10.6 d vs 15.7 d(P0.01),and the IABP group was higher than the control group in successful rate of PCI[75%(30/40) vs 54.1 %(20/37)(P0.01)] and lower than the control group in death rate 1.6%(1/61) vs 6.7%(4/60)(P0.001),and the level of EF(35%→58% vs 34%→43%) made no difference before treatment,while made remarkable difference after treatment(P0.05).On the other hand,there were no difference between two groups on BNP before treatment([WTBX]P[WTBZ]0.05);IABP group was lower than the control group on the BNP after treatment,there were significantly difference in two groups[4893±966→316±91 vs 4687±912→511±120(ng/L)]([WTBX]P[WTBZ]0.01).As for the complication,there were few patients with bleeding [3.2%(2/61)],hematoma[3.2%(2/61)],acute earterial embolism[1.6%(1/61)],fever[1.6%(1/61)],pletlet decreasing [4.8%(3/61)].Although there were more complications in IABP group,after treatment the symptom got advanced and there were no severe complication.[WT9.HZ]Conclusion[WT9.BZ] IABP can significantly advance the hemodynamic indexes and serum BNP level of the patients of ACS with pump failure,can ease the pain of Angina,improve the tolerance and successful rate of the PCI treatment,and decrease death rate.and there is no severe complication,and it is a kind of safe treatment.[JP3][WT9.HZ]
出处 《中国实用医药》 2011年第35期6-9,共4页 China Practical Medicine
基金 2009年广东省科技计划项目(项目编号:2009B030801338)
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 泵衰竭 主动脉内球囊反搏 脑利钠肽 [WT9.BZ] Acute coronary syndrome Pump failure Intra aortic balloon pump Brain natriuretic peptide
作者简介 通讯作者:吴铿E—mail:zjwukeng@hotmail.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lee MS, Makkar RR. Percutaneous left ventricular supportdevices. Cardiol Clin,2006,24:265- 275.
  • 2Stone GW, Marsalese D, Brodil BR, Griffin JJ, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intra aortic balloon counterplusation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angiop lasty. J AM Coil Cardiol, 1997, 29 : 1459-1467.
  • 3Bruce R, Brodie, MD, Thomas D, et al. Intra aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary pereutaneoustransluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high risk patiens with acute myocardial infarction. AM J Cardio,2007, 84: 18223.
  • 4MISHRA S, CHU W W, TORGUSON R, et al. Role of prophylactic intra aortic balloon pump in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardio1,2006 ,98 :608-612.
  • 5陆东风,熊龙根,刘世明,李国强,原萧,梁慧心,温利芳.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及主动脉球囊反搏治疗疗效[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2003,11(5):267-269. 被引量:33
  • 6ROUBILL E F, CA YLAG, PICOT M C, et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) after revascularized STEMI: Is CRP a prognostic factor? Rev Med Interne,2008,29:868-874.
  • 7胡迎富,邓长金,贺爱珍,张玄,陈亚锋,代治国.血小板源性生长因子mRNA水平在冠状动脉侧支循环形成中的作用[J].临床心血管病杂志,2005,21(5):309-310. 被引量:1
  • 8Chang SN, Hwang JJ, Chen YS, et al. Clinical experience with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation over 10 years: A retrospective cohort study of 459 patients. Resuscitation. 2008 Feb 29 [ Epub ahead of print].
  • 9Maiset A B-type natriuretic peptide levels: a potential novel" white count" for congestive heart failure. J Card Fail, 2001,7 ( 2 ) : 183-193.
  • 10彭夫松,李瑞杰.脑钠素在心功能不全诊断治疗中的临床意义[J].国外医学(心血管疾病分册),2003,30(5):291-293. 被引量:14

二级参考文献53

  • 1[1]Maeda K,Tsutamota T, Wada A, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker of high left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Am Heart J,1998,135 : 825-832.
  • 2[2]Maisel AS,Krishnaswamy P, Richards M, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med, 2002,347:161-167.
  • 3[3]Mcdonagh TA, Robb SD, Murdoch DR, et al. Biochemical detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Lancet, 1998,351:9-13.
  • 4[5]Suzuki T, Yamaoki K, Nakajima O, et al. Screening for cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic patients by measuring B-type natriuretic peptide levels . Jpn Heart J, 2000,41: 205-214.
  • 5[6]Cowie MW.BNP: soon to become a routine measure in the care of patients with heart failure? Heart,2000,83:617-618.
  • 6[7]Harrison A, Morrison LK, Krishnaswamy P, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts future cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Ann Emerg Med, 2002, 39: 131-138.
  • 7[8]Valli N, Gobinet A, Bordenave L. Review of 10 years of the clinical use of brain natriureric peptide in cardiology.J Lab Clin Med, 1999, 134:437-444.
  • 8Uusimaa P, Ruskoaho H, Vuolteenaho O, et al. Int J Cardiol,1999,69(1) :5-14.
  • 9Yu CM,Sanderson JE. Eur J Heart Fai1,1999,1(1):59-65.
  • 10Yasumoto K,Takata M, Ueno H, et al. Am J Hypertens,1999,12(9 Pt 1) :921-924.

共引文献142

同被引文献61

  • 1韩雅玲.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(12):50-59. 被引量:134
  • 2吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:180
  • 3Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, et al. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA, 1968, 203:113-118.
  • 4Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen C, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in higb-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, 1999,84 : 18-23.
  • 5Cohen M, Dawson MS, Kopistansky C, et al. Sex and other predictors of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation-relatcd complications: prospective study of 1119 consecutive patients. Am Heart J,2000 ,139 :282-287.
  • 6Briguori C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, et al. Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J, 2003,145 : 700- 707.
  • 7Vijayalakshmi K, Kunadian B, Whittaker VJ, et al. Intra-aortic counterpulsation does not improve coronary flow early after PCI in a high-risk group of patients : observations from a randomized trial to explore its mode of action. J Invasive Cardiol, 2007,19: 339- 346.
  • 8Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2010, 304: 867 -874.
  • 9Sjauw KD, Engstrm AE, Vis MM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?. Eur Heart J ,2009,30:459468.
  • 10Unverzagt S, Machemer MT, Solms A, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation ( IABP ) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011,6 : CD007398.

引证文献5

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部