期刊文献+

承运人联盟合作博弈机制设计 被引量:10

Cooperative Game Based Mechanisms Design in Carrier Alliance
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 承运人联盟中,各成员追求各自收益最大化,成员与联盟的最优决策往往是不一致的,因而导致联盟不稳定.承运人面对产生的需求有2种选择:接受或拒绝.考虑该约束条件,在一个由承运人联盟运营的航运物流网络的基础上,以合作博弈理论和数学规划为框架建立了承运人联盟的合作博弈模型,并设计了运力互租价格为核心的收益分摊机制,该机制为联盟成员提供了补偿性支付.分别对联盟和成员的决策过程进行数学建模,运用逆优化技术使得两者的最优决策一致,进而实现了联盟和合作的可持续性. After carriers forming an alliance,because each carrier operates according to its own profits,the benefit of each member is usually not in line with the whole alliance's,which leads to the instability of alliance.Carriers have two choices when facing emerging customer needs: refuse or accept.Combined the constraints,and based on the establishment of shipping logistics network operated by a carrier alliance,cooperative game theory and mathematical programming method are utilized to establish the cooperative model of carrier alliance.And effective allocation mechanism is designed to provide side payment to each member.The decision process of alliance and individual member is modeled respectively,and inverse optimization technique is utilized to make the optimal decision of individual member accord with the whole alliance's.In this way,the sustainability of alliance and collaboration is realized.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1778-1781,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金重大国际(地区)合作研究项目(70831160527) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771063)
关键词 合作博弈 承运人联盟 机制设计 逆优化 cooperative game carrier alliance mechanism design inverse optimization
作者简介 王文杰(1984-),男,山东省寿光市人,硕士生,主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理. 陈峰(联系人),男,副教授,电话(Tel.):021-34206101;E-mail:fchen@sjtu.edu.cn,
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kubo M, Kasugai H. On the core of the network de- sign game[J]. Journal of Operations Research, 1992, 35(3) :250-255.
  • 2Sanchez-Soriano J. Pairwise solutions and the core of transportation situations [J]. European Journal of Op- erational Research, 2006, 175(1): 101-110.
  • 3宋鹏,陈峰.面向承运人与发货人联盟的调度博弈[J].上海交通大学学报,2010,44(12):1682-1686. 被引量:1
  • 4Midoro R, Pitto A. A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping [J]- Maritime Policy and Management, 2000, 27(1).. 31-40.
  • 5Song D W, Panayides P M. A conceptual application of cooperative game theory to liner shipping strategic alliances [J]. Maritime Policy and Management, 2001, 29(3) : 285-301.
  • 6Agarwal R, Ergun 0. Mechanism design for a multi- commodity flow game in service network alliances [J]. Operations Research Letters, 2008, 36 (5) : 520-524.
  • 7Ahuja R K, Orlin J B. Inverse optimization [J]. Operations Research, 2001, 49(5):771-783.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Curiel I, Pederzoli G, Tijs S. Sequencing games[J]. European J Operations Research, 1989, 40:344-351.
  • 2Calleia P, Estevez-Fernandez A, Borm P, et al. Jobscheduling, cooperation, and control[J]. Operations Research, 2006, 34:22-28.
  • 3Hamers H, Borm P, Tijs S. On games corresponding to sequencing situations with ready times[J]. Mathematics Programming, 1995, 69: 471-483.
  • 4Curiel I, Potters J, Prasad R, et al. Sequencing and cooperation[J]. Operations Research, 1994, 42: 566- 568.
  • 5Borm P, Fiestras-Janeiro G, Hamers H, etal. On the convexity of games corresponding to sequencing situations with due dates[J]. Enropean J Operatinns Research, 2002, 136:616-634.
  • 6Calleja P, Borm P, Hamers H, et al. On a class of parallel sequencing situations and related games [J]. Operations Research, 2002, 109 : 263-276.
  • 7Hamers H, Klijn. F, Suijs J. On the balancedness of m-sequencing games[J]. European J Operations Research, 1999, 119: 678-691.
  • 8Velzen V B, Hamers H. On the balancedness of relaxed sequencing games [J]. Mathematics Methods Operations Research, 2003, 57 (2) :287-297.
  • 9Peters H. Game theory: A multi-leveled approach [M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.

同被引文献60

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部