期刊文献+

低危晚期早产儿学龄前期认知和视觉运动整和能力研究 被引量:3

Cognitive and visual-motor integration performance in low-risk late preterm preschoolers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探究学龄前期低危晚期早产儿认知发育状态和视觉-运动整合能力,比较其与同龄正常儿童的差异,为实施针对性干预方案提供依据。【方法】以上海-Wechsler学前及初学儿童智能测验量表和中国修订Beery视觉-运动整合测验工具评估69例学龄前期儿童(其中早产儿31例,正常足月儿38例)的智能和视觉运动整合能力。【结果】早产儿组的语言、操作和总智能分均值为:97±21、107±15、102±18;正常足月儿组依次为112±15、128±12、122±11。两组儿童智能虽处于平均水平,但早产儿组的认知能力远低于正常足月儿组(t=5.53,P<0.01),尤其在高级语言能力和操作能区上表现的更为薄弱。早产儿和正常足月儿组的视觉-运动整合能力均值分别为:88±16、109±18,两组间差异有高度统计学意义(t=4.93,P<0.01),且其差距较操作能区的差异还要大,达到了24%。将视觉-运动整合分值与总智商做相关分析发现,两者存在着正相关(r=0.6,P<0.05)。【结论】低危晚期学龄前期早产儿,虽具备正常认知能力,但仍较正常足月儿落后,尤其在高级语言功能和视觉感知运动方面,差距甚大。应在学龄前期对这类儿童加强随访评估,实施针对性干预措施。 [Objective] To investigate low-risk late preterm preschoolers' cognitive and visual-motor integration per formanee and compare them to normal children. [Methods] Participants were 31 late preterm and 38 normal children who were 4 to 6 years old and were [ree from major disability. They were evaluated using the Chinese population adaptation of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) and Berry visual motor integration kit (VMI). [Results] The mean scores of VIQ, PIQ and FIQ in preterm and lull-term group were 97±21, 107±15, 102±18; 112±15, 128± 12, 122±11 respectively. Compared with normal children,the preterm preschoolers had significantly lower level in the tests of verbal, performance and overall intelligence quotients (P〈0.01), particularly in higher-level verbal and performance function, although the levels were within the average range. The mean scores of VM1 in preterm and lull-term preschoolers were 88± 16 and 109± 18. The poor ability of VMI in preterm children had significantly 24% differenee with the control group, even worse than the performanee intelligence quotients. Furthermore, the VMI was positively correlated with the full intelligence quotients (r=0.6,P〈0.05). [Conclusions] Low-risk late preterm preschoolers with average cognition capability still have poorer cognitive ability compared with the normal children. Moreover, they are at risk of defect in visual-spatial perception and higher-functional verbal capability. Detection specific visual perceptual and verbal dysfunction before school age, even in children with a low risk of mental and neurological problems could provide specific rehabilitative strategies to prevent learning and/or behavioral problems.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 2011年第12期1080-1083,共4页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金 上海市教委0~3岁高危儿社区早教指导服务研究(B07048)
关键词 晚期早产儿 认知能力 视觉-运动整合 late-preterm cognitive profile visual-motor integration
作者简介 冯菁菁(1982-),女,上海人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为婴幼儿视觉认知发育。 【通信作者】徐秀,E—mail:xuxiu@shmu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Martin J A, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2003[J]. National Vital Statistics Report ,2005,54-116.
  • 2Jain L. School outcome in late preterm infants: a cause for concern[J]. J Pediatr Ju1,2008,153:5-6,.
  • 3Saigal S,Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood[J].Lancet, 2008, 371:261-269.
  • 4Engle WA. A recommendation for the definition of late preterm (near-term) and the birth weight-gestational age clas- sification system[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2006,30 ( 1 ): 2-7.
  • 5中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.中国城市早产儿流行病学初步调查报告[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2005,7(1):25-28. 被引量:320
  • 6Maj nemer A, Brownstein A, Kadanoff R, et al. A comparison of neurobehavioral performances of healthy term and low- risk preterm infants at term[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 1992,34:417-424.
  • 7De Haan M,Bauer PJ ,Georgieff MK,et al. Explicit memory in low-risk infant aged 19 months born between 27 and 42 of gestation[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol , 2000,42: 304-312.
  • 8Tideman E. Longitudinal follow-up of children born preterm: cognitive development at age 19[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2000,58:81- 90.
  • 9Vicari S, Caravale B, Carlesimo GA, et al. Spatial working memory deficits in children at ages 3-4 who were low birth weight, preterm infants [J]. Neuropsychology, 2004, 18: 673-678.
  • 10Huddy CL, Johnson A, Hope PL, Educational and behav- ioural problems in babies of 32-35 weeks gestation[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ,2001,85:23-28.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Martin JA,Hamilton BE,Sutton PD,et al.Birth:Final data for 2003[J].Natl Vital Stat Rep,2005,54(2):1-116.
  • 2Institute of Medicine.Preterm birth:Causes,consequences,and prevention[M].Washington,DC:National Academies Press,2006,21-37.
  • 3Wang ML,Dorer DJ,Fleming MP,et al.Clinical outcomes of near-term infants[J].Pediatrics,2004,114(2):372-376.
  • 4Escobar GJ,Greene JD,Hulac P,et al.Rehospitalisation after birth hospitalization:Patters among infants of all gestations[J].Arch Dis Child,2005,90(2):125-131.
  • 5Hansen AK,Wisborg K,Uldbjerg N,et al.Elective caesarean section an respiratory morbidity in the tern and near-term neonate[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2007,86(4):389-394.
  • 6Clark R.The epidemiology of respiratory failure in neonates born at an estimated GA 34 weeks or more[J].J Perinatol,2005,25(4):251-257.
  • 7Escobar G,Clark R,Greene J.Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36 weeks gestation:We need to ask more questions[J].Sem Perinatol,2006,30(1):28-33.
  • 8Kinney HC.The near-term (late pre-term) human brain and risk for periventricular leukomalacia:A review[J].Semin Perinatol,2006,30(2):80-88.
  • 9Waitzman K.The importance of positioning the near-term infant for sleep,play and development[J].Neonat Infant Nurs Rev,2007,7:76.
  • 10Beauman S,Morris A.Neonatal resuscitation guidelines and the late preterm infant[J].Neonat Infant Nurs Rev,2007,7:82.

共引文献355

同被引文献18

  • 1鲍秀兰,李月萍.重视婴幼儿健全人格的培养[J].教育生物学杂志,2013,1(3):169-172. 被引量:6
  • 2毛萌,杨慧明.儿童早期发展的社会生物学意义[J].教育生物学杂志,2014,2(3):139-143. 被引量:5
  • 3Voigt B,Pietz J,Pauen S,et al. Cognitive development in ver-y vs. moderately to late prelerm and full-term children: Caneffortful control account for group differences in toddler-hood. [J]. Early Human Development, 2012 ,88 : 307-313.
  • 4Allen MC, Cristofalo E, Aucolt S.et al, Neurodevelopmentaloutcomes of preterm infant,s[J]. Current Opinion In Neurot-o.,2008,21(2) :123-128.
  • 5Woodward LJ , Moor S. Hood KM,eZ al. Very preterm chil-dren show impairments across multiple neurodevelopmentaldomains by age 4 years[J]. Arch Dis Child-Fetal NeonatalEJ,2009,94(5):339-344.
  • 6Bregje AH, Bianca GO,Loekie VS,et al. Improvement of de-velopmental outcome between 24 and 36 months correctedage in very preterm infants[J]. Acta Paediatrica , 2010, 99.12):1801-1806.
  • 7Van Baar AL, Ultee K, Gunning WB. et al. Developmentalcourse of very preterm children in relation to school outcome[J 3. Dev Phys Disabii, 2006 ,18 : 273-293.
  • 8Hillemeier MM, Farkas G, Morgan PL, et al. Disparities inthe prevalence of cognitive delay : how early do they appear.. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol.2009 .23 : 186-198.
  • 9Romeo DM, Di Stefano A, Convcrsano M , et al. Neurodevel-opmental outcome at 12 and 18 months in late preterm in-fants[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2010,14 : 503-507.
  • 10Woythaler MA,McCormick MC,Smith VC. Late preterm in-fants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomesthan term infants[J]. Pediatrics ,2011 ,127(3): 622-629.

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部