摘要
"得到辩护的真信念"是西方哲学从纯粹的认知兴趣出发得出的关于知识的一贯定义,从这一定义出发,命题信念和客体信念根本不同。在西方知识论视域中对比考察儒家、道家和墨家述"知"的句法及其基本理论特点,我们可以得出结论:尽管先秦时期不乏纯粹的认知旨趣和句法等形式逻辑上的追求,但关于知的论述都以伦理诉求为旨归,从而缺乏西方文化传统中相应的成熟的认知理论以及形式逻辑体系。
＂Justified true belief＂ has been the definition of knowledge in western philosophy from the perspective of pure interest in cognition.It follows that a propositional belief is fundamentally different from an objective belief.Against the background of western epistemology,the syntax used by and the theoretical features of Confucianists,Taoists and Mohists on the issue of ＂knowledge＂ are compared and contrasted and the conclusion is： although there were some scholars interested in the pursuit of pure knowledge and formal logic such as syntax in the pre-Qin period,most theorization about knowledge was based on ethics and fell short of the rigor and maturity of epistemology and formal logic in the tradition of western culture.
出处
《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期106-112,共7页
Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金
2011年度全国社会科学基金西部项目"当代科学哲学前沿问题研究--基于科学理解的视角"(11XZX004)
关键词
先秦时期
西方知识论
知识
知
the pre-Qin period
western epistemology
knowledge
knowing
作者简介
毕文胜，男，安徽安庆人，云南师范大学哲政学院副教授，厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心副研究员，哲学博士。
