期刊文献+

股骨粗隆间骨折三种手术方式的疗效分析 被引量:6

The analysis of effect on the femoral instable intertrochanteric fracture
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察探讨动力髓螺钉DHS,股骨近端髓内钉PFN,双极人工股骨头置换术在治疗股骨粗隆间骨折治疗中的应用和疗效。方法选择笔者所在医院2007年3月~2011年3月76例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,根据其骨折部位及特点,分别采用DHS,PFN内固定及人工股骨头置换进行治疗,其中DHS治疗28例,PFN治疗37例,人工股骨头置换(BHR)11例。结果 76例获得随访,时间为3~16个月,平均5.5个月,结果随访优良率分别为89.5%、91.3%、90.9%。结论各种固定有其自身特点,以上三种方法对治疗股骨粗隆间骨折均有其适应证,关键是选择合适的病例,即个性化治疗。 Objective To observe and discuss the DHS,PFN,BHR application and its effect of the instable femoral intertrochanteric fracture.Methods Retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of 76 cases of patients with intertrochanteric fractures from March 2007 to March 2011 who were treated with DHS,PFN and BHR.There were 28 cases in DHS group,37 cases in PFN group and 11 cases in BHR group.Results With the 3-16(5.5)months follow up after the operation,the excellent and good rate of DHS group was 89.5%,thee xcellent and good rate of PFN group was 91.3%,thee xcellent and good rate of BHR group was 90.9%.Conclusion Every group has own benefit.During above three methods to treat the thighbone thick prosperous bone fracture to have its indication,the key are choice appropriate case of illness,namely personalized treatment.
机构地区 句容市人民医院
出处 《中外医学研究》 2011年第29期17-19,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 内固定治疗 DHS PFN 关节置换术 Intertrochanteric fracture Internal fixatio DHS PFN Prosthetic replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

共引文献396

同被引文献47

  • 1姚庚华,朱利民.股骨近端防旋髓内针与解剖锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆骨折的疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2130-2132. 被引量:29
  • 2李光辉,夏仁云,王体沛,陈安民,李锋.动力髋螺钉治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的手术风险及疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(20):1538-1539. 被引量:73
  • 3唐佩福,姚琦,黄鹏,梁雨田,陶笙,郭义柱,张群,梁向党,屈波,王岩.股骨近端髓内钉-螺旋刀片治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(7):622-624. 被引量:283
  • 4胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎,等.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2006:825.
  • 5Al-Ani AN,Samuelsson B,Tidermark J,et al. Early operation onpatients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to inde-pendent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone JointSurg Am,2008,90(7) : 1436-1442.
  • 6朱宏强.老年人股骨粗隆间骨折两种内固定手术治疗的疗效分析.中国基层医药,2011,18(zl) :33-34.
  • 7Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et al. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate:a prospective, randomized study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002,84-A (3) :372- 381.
  • 8Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Mufioz FM, et al. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures:a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005,19 (4) :229- 233.
  • 9Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, et al. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA):a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(4) :428-432.
  • 10Cheng T, Zhang GY, Liu T, Zhang XL. A meta-analysis of percutaneous compression plate versus sliding hip screw for the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012, 72 ( 5 ) :1435-1443.

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部