摘要
20世纪以来,国人对汉字与古埃及圣书字的比较研究取得了不少成果,也存在一些不足。成果主要是发现了两种文字在造字原理上的一些相似性。不足主要有以下三个方面:一、对埃及文字事实的了解不够深入;二、套用六书模式进行比较,有一些不恰当的归类分析;三、多为举例对照以说明六书,系统的比较和普通文字学意义上的阐发不够。
Since the 20th Century, Chinese scholars have achieved a lot in the comparative study of Chinese writing and Egyptian hieroglyphs. Especially, scholars find many similarities in the formation methods of these two writing systems. However, there are still some weaknesses in this research field. Firstly, Chinese scholars do not have enough knowledge of Egyptian hieroglyphs. Secondly, in the past studies scholars have usually adopted the ＂six writing methods＂ which is not suitable for analysis of Egyptian hier- oglyphs. Thirdly, in the past studies Chinese scholars mainly gave examples to illustrate the ＂six writing methods＂ in both writing systems, but there was little systematic elucidation of the comparative results from the general perspective of world＇s writing systems.
出处
《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2011年第5期78-83,共6页
Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金
中国海洋大学"中央高校基本科研业务费"资助项目"古汉字和古埃及圣书字记录语言方式的比较研究"的阶段性成果
关键词
汉字
古埃及
圣书字
比较
Chinese Writing
Ancient Egypt
Hieroglyph
Comparative study
作者简介
陈永生（1981-），男，山东莱芜人，中国海洋大学文学与新闻传播学院讲师，主要从事比较文字学研究。
