期刊文献+

泛认知悖论研究及其方法论探纲

Methodological Research on Universal Epistemic Paradoxes
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过考察认知悖论的缘起及其共同特征揭示它们是从不同角度对知识论提出的挑战。在此基础上将泛认知悖论分成三大类:关于"信念一致"的认知悖论、关于"合理相信"的认知悖论和涉及本体论的认知悖论。最后指出当前泛认知悖论研究的整体趋向。 By investigating the shared features of epistemic paradoxes,it can be found that they are actually the different aspects challenging the theory of knowledge.On the basis of this analysis these paradoxes can be further classified into three groups: the epistemic paradoxes with regards to "consistency of belief",the epistemic paradoxes about "how to believe rationally",and the epistemic paradoxes concern ontology.Then,the trends of epistemic paradoxes research are discussed.
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2011年第8期18-22,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词 认知悖论 方法论研究 知识论 epistemic paradoxes methodological research theory of knowledge
作者简介 雒白新(1979-),男,山西朔州人,博士后,研究方向:现代逻辑、逻辑哲学; 黄华新(1959-),男,浙江慈溪人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:语言、逻辑与认知的交叉。
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1G W Erickson, J A Fossa. Dictionary of Paradox [ K ]. Lanham: University Press of Anerica Inc. , 1998.
  • 2D Scott. Plato' s Meno [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press ,2005.
  • 3G E Moore. A Reply to My Critics[ C]//P. Schilpp. The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. La Salle, Ill.: Opencourt, 1942.
  • 4H Kyburg. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief [ M ]. Middleton : Wesleyan University Press, 1961.
  • 5D C Makinson. The Paradox of the Preface[ J ]. Analysis, 1965 (25).
  • 6S Kripke. A Puzzle about Belief[ C]//A Margalit. Mean- ing and Use. Dordrecht : Reidel, 1979.
  • 7C G Hempel. Studies in the Logic of Conformation ( 1 ) [ J ]. Mind, 1945 (54).
  • 8N Goodman. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast [ M ]. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1983.
  • 9F B Fitch. A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts [ J ]. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1963 (28).
  • 10W D Hart, C McGinn. Knowledge and Necessity [ J ]. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1976 (5).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部