摘要
从规范、实证的角度予以观察,行政诉讼非法证据排除规则中所指的非法证据仅指违反法定程序或方式而取得的证据,即"非法取得证据"。对该种证据我国法律规范中采取原则排除加例外、严格排除和相对排除相结合的模式。从法律体系的规范层面来看,我国行政诉讼非法证据排除规则还未形成多层次的证据法律体系,在基本法律这一效力层面有待进一步突破。该规则在行政案件司法实践中的运用还远远不足,有待司法人员更深入、更大胆、更多地将其运用到具体的个案中。
From the point of norm and demonstration, illegal evidence only refers to the evidence obtained through illegal means which violates legal procedures, namely ＂illegally obtained evidence＂. In our legal norms, this kind of evidence has been structured in the model-type that additional exceptions to the principle of exclusion, and relative exclusion combining with strictly exclusion. From the normative level of the legal system, the exclusionary nile of illegal evidence in administrative litigation has not yet formed a mtdti-level legal system, and the basic legal aspects of this effect needs further breakthrough. The use of judicial practice with the rule in administrative cases is far less, pending judicial offers further, more aggressive, more used to their specific cases.
出处
《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》
2011年第2期99-103,共5页
Journal of Huan Public Security College
关键词
行政诉讼
非法证据排除规则
法律规范
司法运用
administrative litigation
exclusionary rule of illegal evidence
legal norm
judicial application
作者简介
宋嫦娥（1986-），女，湖南常德人，厦门大学法学院2009级宪法与行政法专业硕士研究生。
