期刊文献+

中、日、德、西英语学习者母语、二语视听工作记忆广度差异研究 被引量:14

A study of the contrast between L1/L2 visual/auditory working memory spans in Chinese,Japanese,German,and Spanish learners
原文传递
导出
摘要 本实验研究探讨母语差异对二语视、听工作记忆广度及其差异的影响。研究结果表明:(1)中、日、德、西英语学习者之间的母语视觉及听觉广度之间基本无差异;但中国学习者的二语视觉广度显著低于德、西学习者,而二语听觉方面,中、日学习者的广度显著低于德、西学习者。(2)所有国别的学习者各语言通道的广度按照由高到低依次为母语听觉、母语视觉、二语视觉和二语听觉。(3)中、日学习者的二语视、听广度差异显著高于德、西学习者,而德国学习者显著低于西班牙学习者,即母语差异对视、听广度差异有显著影响;同时,认知风格和视听训练比例与这一差异之间存在显著的弱相关。综上所述,母语与二语的语言距离对二语视、听工作记忆广度本身以及二语视、听工作记忆广度差异均有显著影响。 This experimental study investigated the effect of the native language on learner's L2 visual and auditory working memory spans and the difference between them.Results showed:(1) The L1 visual/auditory spans across Chinese,Japanese,German,and Spanish learners of English were approximately identical.While the visual span score of the Chinese learners was significantly lower than those of the German and Spanish learners,those of the auditory spans of the Chinese and Japanese learners were significantly lower than those of the German and Spanish learners.(2) In learners of all nationalities,the spans ranking from highest to lowest were L1 auditory,L1 visual,L2 visual,and L1 auditory.(3) The difference between L2 visual and auditory spans in Chinese and Japanese learners was significantly more obvious than that in German and Spanish learners,and the case of the German learners was significantly less obvious than that of the Spanish learners.That is,the native language had an effect on the difference between learner's L2 visual and auditory spans.Besides,cognitive style and practice modality both had significant but weak correlations with such difference.In sum,the distance between L1 and L2 has an effect on both the learner's L2 visual and auditory working memory spans and the difference between them.
作者 徐浩
机构地区 北京外国语大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期550-561,640,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 2009年北京市教育委员会社科计划面上项目"母语 二语类型差异与视听工作记忆广度研究"(SM200910028005)的研究成果
作者简介 通讯地址:100089北京市北京外国语大学中国外语教育研究中心
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Baddeley, A. 1986. Working Memory[M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 2Baddeley, A. 2003. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4: 829-839.
  • 3Baddeley, A. &G. Hitch. 1974. Working memory [A]. In G. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory ( Vol. 8 ) [C]. New York.. Academic Press. 47-80.
  • 4Baddeley, A., V. Lewis & G. Vallar. 1984. Exploring the articulatory loop [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36: 233-252.
  • 5Barrouillet, P., S. Bernardin & V. Camos. 2004. Time constraints and resource sharing inadult's working memory spans[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 133: 83-100.
  • 6Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Friedman, P. & A. Miyake. 2004. The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 51:136-158.
  • 8Goo, J. 2010. Working memory and reactivity[J]. Language Learning 60: 1-41.
  • 9Hu, C. 2003. Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning [J]. Language learning 53: 429-462.
  • 10Mackey, A., R. Adams, C. Stafford & P. Winke. 2010. Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity [J]. Language Learning 60: 501-533.

二级参考文献211

  • 1张明,隋洁,方伟军.学习困难学生视空间工作记忆提取能力的多指标分析[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):565-568. 被引量:30
  • 2宋华,张厚粲,舒华.在中文阅读中字音、字形的作用及其发展转换[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):139-144. 被引量:64
  • 3温植胜.对外语学能研究的重新思考[J].现代外语,2005,28(4):383-392. 被引量:27
  • 4丁锦红,王丽燕.语音回路与阅读理解关系的眼动研究[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):694-701. 被引量:12
  • 5Baddeley, A. 1986. Working Memory[M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Baddeley, A. & G. Hitch. 1974. Working memory [A]. In G. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory [C]. New York: Academic Press. 47-89.
  • 7Balaguer, R., N. Sebastian-Galles, B. Diaz & A. Rodriguez-Fornells. 2005. Morphological processing in early bilinguals: An ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing[J]. Cognitive Brain Research 25: 312-327.
  • 8Bialystok, E. & B. Miller. 1999. The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 127-145.
  • 9Birdsong, D. 1999. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis [M]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 10Birdsong, D. & M. Molis. 2001. On the evidence of maturational constraints in second-language acquisition [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 44 :235-249.

共引文献203

同被引文献266

引证文献14

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部