期刊文献+

大豆品种(系)钾响应度的基因型差异 被引量:1

Genotypic Difference of Potassium Responsiveness of Soybean Varieties(lines)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对我国土壤钾素资源短缺,大豆种质资源丰富的特点,以东北三省72份大豆品种(系)为试材,采用田间试验的方法,设低钾和对照2个处理,通过3 a的试验,以产量、钾响应度为指标评价大豆对低钾胁迫的基因型差异。结果表明:不同大豆品种(系)的产量、钾响应度的差异十分明显,根据低钾条件下大豆的产量和钾响应度,将供试品种(系)划分为高产低响应型、高产高响应型、低产低响应型和低产高响应型。其中T40、铁豆36和铁丰33为高产低响应型;辽豆17、石二和铁丰31为高产高响应型;这些品种(系)可以为低钾土壤的大豆生产和钾高效大豆品种的选育提供参考。 In view of the potassium deficiency and abundant soybean germplasm resources in China,72 soybean varieties(lines) from northeast China were as test materials.Field experiment was conducted with low potassium stress and adequate potassium supply.Genotype difference in low potassium stress was evaluated by yield and K responsiveness from 2006 to 2008.The results showed that difference of yield and K responsiveness among soybean varieties(lines) were obvious.According to the yield in low potassium stress and K responsiveness,soybean varieties(lines) were divided into four types:(1) high yield and low K responsiveness type;(2) high yield and high K responsiveness type,(3) low yield and low K responsiveness type,(4) low yield and high K responsiveness type.T40,Tiedou 36 and Tiefeng 33 were high yield and low K responsiveness type.Liaodou 17,Shi 2 and Tiefeng 31 were high yield and high K responsiveness type.These soybean varieties(lines) can provide the reference for soybean production in potassium deficient soil and breeding of potassium high efficiency soybeans.
出处 《大豆科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期413-418,共6页 Soybean Science
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2006BAD02A15)资助项目 沈阳农业大学青年教师基金(2005056)资助项目
关键词 大豆 低钾胁迫 钾响应度 产量 Soybean Low-potassium stress K responsiveness Yield
作者简介 李春红(1974-),女,在读博士,讲师,从事作物营养与遗传育种研究。E-mail:lichunhong0210@sohu.com。 通讯作者:曹敏建(1953-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事作物抗逆生理研究。E-mail:caominjian@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1鲁如坤.我国土壤氮、磷、钾的基本状况[J].土壤学报,1989,26(3):280-286. 被引量:190
  • 2谢建昌,周健民.我国土壤钾素研究和钾肥使用的进展[J].土壤,1999,31(5):244-254. 被引量:191
  • 3孙爱文,张卫峰,杜芬,高利伟,张福锁,陈新平.中国钾资源及钾肥发展战略[J].现代化工,2009,29(9):10-14. 被引量:80
  • 4Pettersson S, Jensen P. Variation among species and varieties in uptake and utilization of potassium[J]. Plant and Soil, 1983,72 : 231-237.
  • 5Glass A D M, Perley J E. Varietal differences in potassium uptake by barley [ J ]. Plant Physiology, 1980,65 : 160-164.
  • 6Woodend , Glass A B M. Genotpe-environment interaction and eorrelatlon belween vegetative anct grain produetion measures of potassium use-efficiency in wheat ( T. aestvurn L. ) grown under potassium stress[ J]. Plant Soi1,1993,151:39-441.
  • 7Shea P E,Gedoff G C,Gabelman W H. Differing efficiency of po- tassium utilization in strains of snap beans [ J]. Plant and Soil, 1968,28:337-346.
  • 8Malmur A, Gerloff G C, Gabelman W H. Physiology and inherit- ance of efficiency in potassium utilization in tomatoes grown under potassium stress[J]. American Society for Horticultural Science, 1978,103 (4) :545-549.
  • 9李共福.耐低钾水稻品种筛选利用的研究I水稻不同品种在低钾条件下的产量差异及耐低钾品种对钾的吸收利用特点.湖南农业科学,1985,(3):15-17.
  • 10林咸永,孙羲.不同水稻基因型对钾肥反应的差异及其根系生理基础[J].土壤通报,1992,23(4):159-161. 被引量:13

二级参考文献142

共引文献641

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部