2Mancuso MS, Szychowski JM, Owen J, et al. Cervical funneling: effect on gestational length and uhrasound-indica- ted cerelage in high-risk women [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol ,2010,203 ( 3 ) :259. e1 -e5.
3Anthony O,Vincenzo B, Meekai S, et al. Shirodkar versus McDonald eerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length [ J ]. Am J Perinatol, 2007,24( 1 ) :55-60.
4Ganesh A, Bettina E, Martin G, et al. Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence:a prospective study [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2006,273 ( 5 ) : 283-287.
6Debby A, Sadan O, Glezerman M, et al. Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Obstet,2007,96 ( 1 ) : 16-19.
7To MS, AlfrevicZ, Heath VC, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short eervix:randomised controlled trial. Lancet,2004,363 (9424) : 1849-1853.
8lares JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis P J, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of ChildHeahh and Human Development Matemal-FetalMedicine Unit Network. N Engl Jmed, 1996,334 ( 9 ) :567-572.
9Taipaie P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks'gestation and the risk ofpreterm delivery. ObstetGyneeo, 1998,92 ( 16 ) :902-907.
10Hibbard JU,Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and the risk for preterm delivery. ObstetGyneco,2000,96 ( 6 ) : 972 -978.
