期刊文献+

SPS措施对福建省农产品出口影响分析 被引量:2

Analysis of SPS′ s impact on export enterprises of agricultural products in Fujian Province
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对福建省22家重点农产品出口企业的问卷调查,详细考察了国外SPS措施对福建省农产品出口的影响。调查结果表明:SPS措施已成为除汇率外影响福建省农产品出口的最重要因素;福建水产品、茶叶和蔬菜受到SPS措施的影响较大;日本和欧盟的SPS措施对福建省农产品出口企业的冲击较大;企业受SPS措施影响的原因,既有国内外标准差异过大、国外标准过高、信息不对称等外因,也有企业出口的农产品质量安全水平较低这一内因,等等。在调研基础上,从政府、协会和企业等层面提出了应对SPS措施的建议。 This paper is mainly to study the impact of SPS measures on export of agricultural products in Fujian Province by questionnaire surveying 22 enterprises.It found that SPS had become the most important factor affect export of agricultural products in Fujian Province,besides the foreign exchange.Aquatic products,vegetable and tea are seriously affected products,the impact from Japan and EU are more serious than other markets.The reasons that the enterprises in Fujian Province restricted by SPS are including external factors such as the great difference between Chinese and foreign standards,too high standards of foreign SPS,insufficient information and the internal factors such as the low quality and safety of Chinese agricultural products.Based on the survey,it gives some suggestions to deal with SPS in the regards of government,intermediate organizations and enterprises.
作者 董银果
出处 《福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期47-51,87,共6页 Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70873082)
关键词 SPS 农产品 出口 SPS agricultural product export
作者简介 董银果(1969-),女,教授。研究方向:农产品国际贸易、WTO规则等。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中国技术性贸易措施年度报告(2009)[R].北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,2009.
  • 2福建省检验检疫局食品处.药残标准更改,我省鳗制品输日总量下跌超半[EB/OL].(2006-06-01)[2010-08-20].http://www.wtofj.cn/secure/display.aspx?id=632847582637343750&type=01.
  • 3董银果.SPS壁垒的评判标准探讨[J].国际商务研究,2009,30(1):1-9. 被引量:12

二级参考文献10

  • 1黄卫平,程大为.国际贸易中动植物卫生检疫措施的壁垒含义分析[J].中国人民大学学报,2001,15(3):54-60. 被引量:17
  • 2董银果.食品国际贸易规制述评[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(9):77-80. 被引量:2
  • 3Beghin, John C. and Bureau, Jean Christophe., 2001a, “Quantitative Policy Analysis of Sanitary, Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade”[J].Economy International 87, p. 107-130.
  • 4Mattoo A., 2001,“Discriminatory Consequence of Non Discriminatory Standards”[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economic Integration, March.
  • 5Roberts, D. and DeKremer, K. Technical Barriers to US Agricultural Exports[R]. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DC. 1997.
  • 6Roberts, D. (1998). A Classification of Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets[C]. Paper presented at the seminar Food Quality and Safety Standards and Trade in Agricultural and Food Products, Agricultural Economics Society, London, December 1998.
  • 7Otsuki, T., J.S. Wilson and M. Sewadeh “Saving two in a Billion.. A case Study on Quantify the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards in African Exports” World Bank, Washington D.C. 2000.
  • 8Mattoo A. Discriminatory Consequence of Non Discriminatory Standards[J]. Journal of Economic Integration, 2001, (3).
  • 9邓竞成.走出“技术性贸易壁垒”的认识误区[J].财贸研究,2003,14(6):18-21. 被引量:8
  • 10张亚斌,姚志毅.技术标准还是技术壁垒?[J].世界经济与政治,2004(2):72-74. 被引量:25

共引文献11

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部