期刊文献+

NCPAP联合大剂量沐舒坦治疗早期新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的研究 被引量:4

Study on NCPAP combined large dose of mucosolvan in treating early neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)联合应用大剂量沐舒坦治疗早期新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效及应用价值。方法:将58例新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿随机分为两组:治疗组(NCPAP联合沐舒坦)30例和对照组(NCPAP组)28例,治疗组在给予NCPAP治疗同时,加用沐舒坦30 mg/(kg.d),6 h 1次,应用3~5 d。比较分析两组病例的临床表现、血气分析、胸片、并发症及吸氧时间、住院时间。结果:治疗组在临床表现、血气分析、胸片恢复方面与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);治疗组吸氧时间和住院时间与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);治疗组发生并发症2例,对照组7例;治疗组1例、对照组6例分别改机械通气,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:NCPAP联用大剂量沐舒坦治疗早期新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征是一种经济有效的治疗方法,适合基层医院推广和应用。 Objective:To assess the curative effect and application value of nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) combined mucosolvan to treat early neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS).Methods:58 NRDS neonates were randomly divided into two groups.On the base of NCPAP treatment,the treatment group(30 cases) was added mucosolvan 30mg/(kgod),once every 6h for 3~5 d.The control group(28 cases) received only NCPAP treatment.The clinical symptoms after treatment,blood gas,chest radiograph,complications,oxygen time and hospitalized duration in the treatment group were compared with those in the control group.Results:The clinical symptoms and signs,chest radiograph,arterial blood gas indicators in the treatment group were improved more significantly than those in the control group with statistical difference(P0.05).2 cases in the treatment group and 7 cases in the control group had complication.1 cases in the treatment group and 6 cases in the control group were changed to use mechanic ventilation with statistical difference(P0.05).Conclusion:NCPAP combined with large dose of mucosolvan is an effective and economical therapeutic method to treat NRDS,which is suitable to application in primary hospitals.
作者 周宏
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2011年第1期27-29,共3页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词 经鼻持续气道正压通气 沐舒坦 新生儿 呼吸窘迫综合征 NCPAP Mucosolvan Neonate Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Ho JJ ,Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ,et al. Continuous dis-tending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants[J]. Coehrane Database Syst Rev,2002, (2):CD002271.
  • 2Poets CF,Sens B. Changes in intubation rates and outcome of very low birth weight infants: a population-based study[J].Pediatrics, 1996, 98 : 24.
  • 3Jonsson B, Katz-Salamon M,Faxelius G, et al. Neonatal care of very- low-birthweight infants in special-care units and neonatal intensive- care units in Stockholm. Early nasal continuous positive airway pres- sure versus mechanical ventilation;gains and losses[J]. Acta Pediatr Suppl, 1997,419:4.
  • 4周晓光,柳国胜.肺表面活性物质预防早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的研究进展[J].中华围产医学杂志,2000,3(1):59-61. 被引量:5
  • 5赵磊,文爱东,吴昌归,史皆然,简文,吴寅,张三奇,石茹.注射用盐酸氨溴索祛痰作用的疗效和安全性评价[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(2):189-192. 被引量:58

二级参考文献2

  • 1[6]Kupczyk M, Kuna P. Mucolytics in acute and chronic respiratory tract disorders. I. Pathophysiology and mechanisms of action[J]. Pol Merkuriusz Lek, 2002;12(69):245-247.
  • 2[7]Kupczyk M, Kuna P. Mucolytics in acute and chronic respiratory tract disorders. II. Uses for treatment and antioxidant properties [J]. Pol Merkuriusz Lek, 2002 ;12(69):248-252.

共引文献61

同被引文献29

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部