期刊文献+

温室甜瓜加氧灌溉综合效益评价 被引量:25

Evaluation of Comprehensive Benefit in Greenhouse Muskmelon under Aeration Irrigation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用基于客观赋值法的熵权信息法与主观赋值法相结合的综合评价方法对不同加氧频率处理温室甜瓜综合效益进行评价,并对各加氧处理进行综合效益排序。结果表明,2天1次的加氧频率处理综合效益最好,每天1次的次之,不加氧处理的综合效益优于3天1次和每天2次处理,沟灌处理的综合效益最差。加氧灌溉均可以不同程度地提高温室甜瓜的产量和品质,但由于加氧处理增加了电费及滴灌设备及管件等资金投入,致使一些加氧处理综合效益降低。地下滴灌的温室甜瓜综合效益始终优于沟灌。 Evaluation of comprehensive benefit was conducted in greenhouse muskmelon under aeration irrigation by applying comprehensive evaluation method,which associated entropy information method based on objective weighting with subjective weighting method.Results showed that the comprehensive benefit order in every treatment was once per two days,once per day,none aeration,once per three days,twice per day,and furrow irrigation treatment.Aeration irrigation could improve yield and quality of greenhouse muskmelon differently,but the comprehensive benefit of some aeration treatments decreased because of the investment of electricity,drip facility,et al.The comprehensive benefit of greenhouse muskmelon in subsurface irrigation treatment was better than in furrow irrigation treatment.
出处 《农业机械学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期79-83,共5页 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50779059 50609022) 山东省高等学校科研发展计划资助项目(J07YF16)
关键词 温室甜瓜 加氧灌溉 综合效益评价 Greenhouse muskmelon Aeration irrigation Comprehensive benefit evaluation
作者简介 作者简介:谢恒星,博士生,主要从事节水灌溉技术研究。E-mail:xiehengxing@nwsuaf.edu.cn 通讯作者:蔡焕杰,教授,博士生导师,主要从事农业节水和水资源高效利用研究,E-mail:caihj@nwsuaf.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Meshkat M, Warner R C, Workman S R. Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface drip and sand tube irrigation[ J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1999, 43 ( 1 ) : 79 - 86.
  • 2Kere G M, Liu N G, Nyalala S P O. Influence of drip irrigation schedule and mulching material on yield and quality of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. 'Money Maker' ) [ J ]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003, 2 (14) : 1052-1058.
  • 3Phene C J, Davis K R, Hutmacher R B, et al. Advantages of subsurface irrigation for processing tomatoes [ J ]. Acta Horticulturae, 1987, 200:101 - 113.
  • 4Hutmacher R B, Mead R M, Shouse P. Subsurface drip: improving alfalfa irrigation in the west [ J]. Irrigation Journal, 1996, 45:48 -52.
  • 5Hassanli A M, Ahmadirad S, Beecham S. Evaluation of the influence of irrigation methods and water quality on sugar beet yield and water use efficiency[ J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97 (2) : 357 -362.
  • 6白丹,王晓愚,宋立勋,李刚,党志良.地下滴灌毛管水力要素试验[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):19-22. 被引量:7
  • 7Meyer W S, Barrs H D, Smith R C G, et al. Effect of irrigation on soil oxygen status and root and shoot growth of wheat in a clay soil[ J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1985, 36(2) : 171 - 185.
  • 8Drew M C. Soil aeration and plant root metabolism[J]. Soil Science, 1992, 154(4) : 259 -267.
  • 9孙周平,郭志敏,王贺.根际通气性对马铃薯光合生理指标的影响[J].华北农学报,2008,23(3):125-128. 被引量:15
  • 10Kurtz K W, Kneebone W R. Influence of aeration and genotypes up on root growth of creeping bentgrass at supraoptimal temperature[ J]. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal, 1980, 3:145 -148.

二级参考文献49

共引文献819

同被引文献292

引证文献25

二级引证文献288

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部