期刊文献+

济南市某医院员工健康危险因素及干预效果评价 被引量:6

Health risk factor and effectiveness of intervention for hospital employees
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价群体干预策略对人群中分布广泛、具有可干预性的健康危险因素进行干预的效果。方法以济南市某医院339名员工为研究对象,通过对生物学(血压高、血糖高、血脂高、超重或肥胖),心理(自我感觉健康差、压力大、工作满意度差、生活满意度差)和生活方式(身体活动少、睡眠质量差、饮酒、吸烟、不合理膳食、使用放松药物)14个健康危险因素进行评估,确认研究对象中分布最广泛、且具有可干预性的身体活动少作干预项目,采取群体干预策略进行干预,比较干预前后各健康危险因素在人群中的分布比例。结果干预6个月后,有3个健康危险因素在员工中的分布比例出现了具有统计学意义的降低(P〈0.05),身体活动少从57.8%下降到38.6%,血脂高从9.4%下降到5.3%,不合理膳食从28.9%下降到14.8%。员工的健康危险因素个数从基线的平均3.10个减少到末期的平均2.71个,并具有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论基于解决主要矛盾、循证医学及健康促进三大原则,采取群体干预策略的健康干预可以有效改善健康危险因素状态。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention for health risk factor in hospital employees. Methods This study was carried out among 339 employees of a hospital in Jinan, Shandong Province. Based on the results of Health Risk Appraisal for 14 health risk factors, we designed a 6-months intervention program for the most widely distributed and intervenable health risk factors; and then evaluated the changes of health risk factors after 6 months. Results After 6-month intervention the prevalence of 3 health risk factors decreased (P 〈 0. 05 ): physical inactivity decreased from 57. 8% to 38.6%, hyperlipidemia from 9.4% to 5.3%, and unhealthy dietary from 28.9% to 14. 8%. Compared with the baseline data, the average number of health risk factors were reduced from 3. 10 to 2. 71 ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion The intervention can reduce health risk factors effectively.
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2010年第11期756-759,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词 健康状况指标 危险因素 群体干预策略 Health status indicators Risk factors Population intervention strategy
作者简介 通信作者:黄建始,Email:pumcjesse@yahoo.com.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Anderson DR,Whitmer RW,Goetzel RZ,et al.The ralationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures.Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) Research Committee.Am J Health Promot,2000,15:45-52.
  • 2Boles M,Pelletier B,Lynch W.The relationship between health risks and work productivity.J Occup Environ Med,2004,46:737-745.
  • 3Burton WN,Chen CY,Conti DJ,et al.The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity.J Occup Environ Med,2005,47:769-777.
  • 4Loeppke R,Hymel PA,Lofland JH,et al.Health-related workplace productivity measurement:general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel.J Occup Environ Med,2003,45:349-359.
  • 5Yen L,Edington MP,McDonald T,et al.Changes in health risks among the participants in the United Auto Workers-General Motors LifeSteps Health Promotion Program.Am J Health Promot,2001,16:7-15.
  • 6Poole K,Kumpfer K,Pett M.The impact of an incentive-based worksite health promotion program on modifiable health risk factors.Am J Health Promot,2001,16:21-26.
  • 7Goetzel RZ,Long SR,Ozminkowski RJ,et al.Health,absence,disability,and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health oonditions affecting U.S.employers.J Occup Environ Med,2004,46:398-411.
  • 8Lavigne JE,Phelps CE,Mushlin A,et al.Reductions in individual work productivity associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics,2003,21:1123-1134.
  • 9Wright DW,Beard MJ,Edington DW.Association of health risks with the cost of time away from work.J Occup Environ Med,2001,43:36-46.
  • 10中国成人超重和肥胖症预防与控制指南编写组.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防与控制指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:8.

二级参考文献27

共引文献37

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部