期刊文献+

三种可靠性分析方法的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison Study on Three Reliability Analysis Methods
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了用CPN建模、GO法和动态故障树进行可靠性分析的基本原理,指出了其各自的构造过程,给出2个CPN模型、GO模型和动态故障树模型实例,并在适用对象、描述系统功能、工程适用性、多态性、发现故障隐患、非单调性等方面对这三种方法进行了对比分析。最后给出这三种方法的优点与不足,并指出这三种方法在描述系统时采用功能模块化的思想和遵循系统功能流程的原则是对传统可靠性理论的一个突破。 This paper,first of all,makes an description on fundamental theories of CPN,GO and dynamic FTA,points out their constructing procedure.Secondly,CPN,GO and dynamic FTA models based on two practical examples are given.Based on these models,we make a comparative analysis on CPN,GO and dynamic FTA in the following several repects concerned:description of system function;engineering suitability,system multi state;application scope;system nonmonotony;easiness to pick out system fault/error potentials.Finally, we give out the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods, and point out that it is a breakthrough to the traditional reliability theories that module concept is used to simulate a system and system functional flow process principle.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 1999年第7期74-77,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
关键词 系统 可靠性 故障树形图分析 动态模型 Reliability Reliability analysis System description CPN GO FTA
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1黄祥瑞 高佳.中试厂乏燃料接受与储存水池GO法风险分析[M].清华大学出版社,1990..
  • 2胡国寿.R工程-设计、试验、管理(上册)[M].北京:宇航出版社,1988..
  • 3周自全.现代飞行模拟技术版本[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1997..
  • 4周自全,现代飞行模拟技术版本,1997年
  • 5黄祥瑞,中试厂乏燃料接受与储存水池GO法风险分析,1990年
  • 6胡国寿,R工程—设计、试验、分析、管理.上,1988年

同被引文献17

  • 1吴萌岭,王孝延,裴玉春,吴海岭.微机控制直通电空制动系统可靠性模型初探[J].铁道车辆,2006,44(3):20-23. 被引量:5
  • 2王智,包成玉.YAG激光器系统可靠性分析中GO法的应用[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(3):377-380. 被引量:10
  • 3[英]奥康纳.实用可靠性工程[M].李莉,译.4版.北京:电子工业出版社,2005:1-59.
  • 4CAI Guoqiang, YANG Jianwei, ZHOU Liming, et al. Reliability analysis of passenger brake system of metro vehicles based on FTA[C]// Proceeding of 2009 International Conference on Modeling Simulation and Optimization. Beijing: [s. n. ], 2009: 323-328.
  • 5ZHOU Liming, CAI Guoqiang, YANG Jianwei, et al.Monte carlo simulation based on FTA in reliability analysis of door system[ C]//Proceeding of 2010 the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering. Singapore: IEEE Press, 2010: 713-717.
  • 6SHEN Zupei, WAN G Yao, HUAN G Xiangrui. A quantification algorithm for a repairable system in the GO methodology[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 80 (3) : 293-298.
  • 7SHEN Zupei, WAN G Yao, HUAN G Xiangrui. A new quantification algorithm for the GO methodology[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 67 ( 3 ) : 241-247.
  • 8Lawless J.F.. Statistical Metholds in Reliability [ J ]. Technometrics, 1983,25 : 305 - 355.
  • 9Schilling M. Th., Prace J C.G., De Queiroz, J. F., et al. Detection of aging in Rehability Analysis of Thermal Generators[ J ]. IEEE Trans. Power Trans. Power System. 1988,3 (2) : 490 - 499.
  • 10Lawless L F. Statistical Methods in Reliability. Technometrics. 1983,25: 305 - 355.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部