摘要
采用CNKI的学术不端文献检测(AMLC)系统,对《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》230篇来稿进行了重复文字比例的检测,发现约有50%的文章存在不同程度的重复文字现象,不同重复比例的文章数呈偏态分布,罕见重复文字比极高的文章。对其中重复比例较高的64篇文章进行了其各部分重复文字标记数的比较,发现医学论文中方法、结果和讨论部分重复文字标记数较多,而摘要、引言和材料等部分较少。对其中的临床研究和基础研究文章进行了比较,发现基础研究论文在引言、方法和结果部分重复文字的标记数高于临床研究论文,但总复制比却没有发现有统计学意义的差别。认为反对和抵制学术不端行为,是多个系统和部门共同协作的系统工程,期刊编辑也应尽其学术把关的职责。
The author of this article checked repeated words in 230 manuscripts contributed to the Journal of SUN Yat-sen University（Medical Sciences） by AMLC system provided by CNKI,found that almost 50% of the manuscripts had repeated words to some extend,and it was un-normal distributed of different word-repetition ratio articles,high word-repetition ratio articles were rarely seen.Among them,64 articles were found relatively high word-repetition ratio,and were analyzed deeply from all parts of the articles.Word-repetition marks were more frequently found in the methods,results,and discussion parts than in the Abstract,introduction,and materials parts.Compared with clinical articles,basic research articles showed more word-repetition marks in the introduction,methods,and results parts,but total repetition ratios were not significant.To argue against and reject academic misconducts is a complicated task that needs cooperation from various systems and departments,but journal editors should better bear their responsibilities as gate keepers.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期447-449,共3页
Acta Editologica
关键词
学术不端文献
医学论文
重复文字比例
分布特征
AMLC系统
academic misconduct literature
medical article
words-repetition ratio
distribution characteristic
AMLC system
