期刊文献+

报复的理论模型及相关因素 被引量:15

Theoretical Models and Related Factors of Vengeance
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 报复是指受害者根据冒犯者的动机,对后果的严重程度进行评估后,实施攻击行为以惩罚或伤害他人的现象。已有研究涉及到报复的心理学内涵及定义,它应当包括认知、情绪和行为三种成分;阐述了报复与宽恕的关系、有关理论模型及其相关因素。未来的研究方向主要在于概念和理论的丰富与完善、研究方法的改进以及对其相关因素的深入实证研究等。 Vengeance is a phenomenon which the victim starts an attack in order to punish or harm others,based on the motivations of the offender,it carries out after the victim appraises the severity of the offense he has received.Previous researches explored the psychological implications and definitions of the vengeance and the author argued that it should consist of cognitive,emotional and behavioral factors.Also,the present article covers the researches on the relationship between vengeance and forgiveness,relevant theoretical models and the related factors.Future studies about vengeance should mainly focus on the enrichment and improvement of the definition and theories,research approaches improvement,and empirical research on related factors.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期1644-1652,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 西南大学博士基金(SWUB2006036) 西南大学国家重点学科基金(西国重04008) 重庆市重点人文社会科学研究基地项目(05JWSK193)资助
关键词 报复 宽恕 自恋 沉思 心理健康 vengeance forgiveness narcissism rumination mental health
作者简介 通讯作者:凤四海,E—mail:bluesky@swu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 86(1), 52-59.
  • 2Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-658.
  • 3Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25(5), 607-631.
  • 4Beehwati, N. N., & Morrin, M. (2003). Outraged consumers: Getting even at the expense of getting a good deal. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 440-453.
  • 5Bellah, C. G., Bellah, L. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2003). A look at dispositional vengefulness from the Three and Five-Factor Models of Personality. Individual Differences Research, 1(1), 6-16.
  • 6Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in organizations: Frontiers in Theory and Research (pp. 246-260), Thousand Oaks, California, US: Sage Publications.
  • 7Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2005). The study of revenge in the workplace: Conceptual, ideological, empirical issues. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations o factors and targets (pp. 65-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • 8Brown, B. R. (1968). The effects of need to maintain face on interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 107-122.
  • 9Brown, R. P. (2004). Vengeance is mine: Narcissism, vengeance and the tendency to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 576-584.
  • 10Brown, R. P., & Phillips, A. (2005). Letting bygones be bygones: Further evidence for the validity of the tendency to forgive scale. Personality and Individual Differences,38,627-638.

同被引文献198

引证文献15

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部