摘要
目的比较一次性使用采血针在儿科水合氯醛保留灌肠镇静和口服水合氯醛镇静的效果。方法将我院儿科门诊92例需行MRI、脑CT、脑电图、心脏超彩超等检查的不合作患儿,采用随机的方法分为观察组和对照组各46例,观察组采用一次性使用采血针10%水合氯醛保留灌肠镇静,对照组采用10%水合氯醛口服镇静,用药后观察其效果。结果观察组有效率97.8%,对照组为82.6%。结论采用一次性采血针在儿科水合氯醛保留灌肠无副作用,能顺利完成各种检查,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the curative effect of one-time utility blood collection needle retention enema sedative chloral hydrate and oral chloral hydrate sedation in pediatric. Methods The 92 uncooperative children in our hospital who need pediatric clinic line MRI,brain CT,EEG,echocardiography and other tests,by randomly divided into observation group and the control group. The children in the observation group were used one-time utility blood collection needle retention enema sedative 10% chloral hydrate and oral 10% chloral hydrate in control group. The effects were observed after treatment. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 97. 8% and the control group was 86. 9%. Conclusion One-time blood collection needle with chloral hydrate in pediatric therapeutic effect to retain satisfied,is worthy of clinical.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2010年第27期58-59,共2页
China Practical Medicine
关键词
水合氯醛
保留灌肠
口服
效果
Chloral hydrate
Retention enema
Oral administration
Effect
