期刊文献+

盲肠置管引流在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值 被引量:1

Application value of implementing catheter drainage in appendix on ano-saving operation for low rectal carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盲肠置管引流在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价植。方法低位直肠癌根治保肛手术共64例,分盲肠置管引流组(研究组,n=32)和保护性回肠造漏组(对照组,n=32)。分别从手术创伤、留置管的引流量、术后肛门排气时间、术后生活质量及吻合口漏的发生率进行比较。结果研究组肛门排气时间(3.25±0.52)d低于对照组(5.68±0.84)d、术后疼痛评分(3.31±0.65)分明显低于对照组(6.08±0.22)分、住院费用(25456.72±23.56)元低于对照组(36879.55±164.34)元,术后生活质量满意度(84.79%)明显优于对照组(36.21%),差异均有统计学意义(t分别=1.62、1.82、1.76,χ2=49.38,P均<0.05)。而留置管引流量、置管拔除时间、手术时间、及发生吻合口漏病例,差异均无统计学意义(t分别=0.38、0.42、0.54,χ2=0.50,P均>0.05)。结论在低位直肠癌保肛手术中,行盲肠置管引流可避免两次手术,提高术后生活质量,具有较大的优越性。 Objective To evaluate the application value of implementing catheter drainage in appendix on anosaving operation for low rectal carcinoma. Methods Sixty four patients with ano-saving operation for low rectal carcinoma were invested. 32 patients had implementing catheter drainage in appendix (research group) and 32 patients had protective ileostomy (control group). Following aspects of two groups were compared:surgical trauma, drainage volume from catheter, anus exhausting time, postoperative pain scores, quality of postoperative life, hospital expense, drainage catheter withdrawing time and the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Results Compared to the controls, anus exhausting time [(3.25±0.52)d vs. (5.68±0.84]d, t=1.62), aspects of postoperative pain scores(3.31±0.65 vs. 6.08± 0.22, t=1.82 ), hospital expense [(25456.72±23.56)yuan vs. (36879.55±164.34)yuan, t=1.76)] and quality of postoperative life (84.79% vs. 36.21%, X2=49.38) were obviously better in the research group (P〈0.05);Compared to the controls, there were no significant differences in drainage volume from catheter, drainage catheter withdrawing time, duration of surgery and the incidence of anastomotic leakage(t=0.38, 0.42,0.54, x2=0.50, P〉0.05). Conclusions In ano-saving operation for low rectal carcinoma, implementing catheter drainage in appendix can avoid the second operation and improve the quality of postoperative life obviously.
作者 陈坚锋
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2010年第2期154-155,161,共3页 Clinical Education of General Practice
关键词 低位直肠癌 保肛手术 盲肠置管引流 low rectal carcinoma ano-saving operation catheter drainage in appendix
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

共引文献11

同被引文献23

  • 1邱辉忠,关竞红,吴斌,林国乐,赵玉沛.经升结肠回肠置管造口预防术后吻合口漏[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(10):637-638. 被引量:9
  • 2吴印爱 王志伟 刘献棠等.不同引流方法预防直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘的效果.国际外科学杂志,2008,35(11):731-734.
  • 3Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningimm C, et al. Influence of a de- functioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis[J]. Br J Surg, 1998,85 (8): 1114-1117. G.
  • 4astinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(9) : 1137-1142.
  • 5Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, et al. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies[J].Dig Surg, 2004, 21 (4) : 277-281.
  • 6Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Korluem M, et al. Morbidity of tempormy loop ileostomy in patients with eolorectal cancer[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49(7) : 1011-1017.
  • 7Garea-Botello SA, Garea-Armengol J, Garcla-Granero E, et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construc- tion and takedown[J]. Dig Surg, 2004, 21(5/6):440-446.
  • 8Wong NY, Eu KW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotie leak after a low anterior resection: a prospec- tive, comparative study[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48 ( 11 ) : 2076-2079.
  • 9Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Christoforidis E, et al. Low anterior re- section without defunctioning stoma[ J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2002, 6 (3) : 153-156.
  • 10Sailer M, Fein M, Fuchs KH, et al. Morphologic changes of the a- nal sphincter musculature during and after temporary stool deviation [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2001 , 386 ( 3 ) : 183-187.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部