期刊文献+

替硝唑根管冲洗液抗菌效果研究 被引量:5

Antimicrobial effects of tinidazole as root canal irrigant
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究替硝唑液作为根管冲洗剂的抗菌效果。方法:将100例单根管慢性根尖周炎患牙随机分为4组(各25例):常规冲洗组(过氧化氢联合氯亚明)、氯己定组、替硝唑组,氯己定联合替硝唑组。用常规法预备根管和针筒式冲洗,各组均分别于根管预备前和根管预备冲洗后取样,在50mL/LCO2、37℃条件下培养48h,记菌落数。结果:根管经预备、冲洗后,各组菌落数较预备前均显著减少(P<0.05)。根管预备、冲洗前后各组菌落数差值相比,常规冲洗组差值最小,与其他各组相比均有显著性差异(P<0.05);其次为氯己定组;氯己定联合替硝唑组差值最大,但与单纯替硝唑组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:替硝唑液对感染根管内厌氧菌有较强杀灭作用,抗菌效果优于氯己定。 AIM:To investigate the antimicrobial effects of Tinidazole as root canal irrigant.METHODS:100 single-rooted teeth with chronic periapical periodontitis were randomly divided into four groups,with 25 teeth in each group.The root canals were irrigated with hydrogen peroxide(HP) with tosylchloramide sodium(TS)(HP+TS),chlorhexindine(CH),tinidazole(TD),chlorhexindine with tinidazole(CH+TD),respectively.Before and after root canal irrigation,a paper point was placed in the lower 1/3 of root canal for 1 min to collect microbial sample.Immediately after sample collection,the paper points were placed on sodium thioglycollate solution and subsequently plated on blood agar plates and incubated in an anaerobic chamber for 48 h.Colony forming units(CFU) were counted and compared by ANOVA with post hoc Turkey tests.RESULTS:After root canal irrigation,CFU in all the 4 groups was significantly reduced(P〈0.05).The sequential CFU number reduction was HP+TS〈CH〈TD〈CH+TD.The CFU in HP+TS group was significantly lower than the other 3 groups(P〈0.05).However,no significant difference was found between the TD and the CH+TD group(P〉0.05).CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that tinidazoli has stronger bacterialcidal effects and is a better candidate than chlorhexindine for root canal irrigation.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第2期68-70,共3页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 上海市科学技术委员会和上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金资助(08DZ2271100)
关键词 根管治疗 根管冲洗剂 细菌 厌氧 root canal therapy root canal irrigation bacteria anaerobe
作者简介 朱铭颐(1978-),女,汉族,上海人。硕士,主治医师 通讯作者:朱亚琴,Tel:021—23271699—5542,E—mail:zyq1590&#183;163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation literature review and case reports [J]. Int Endod J, 2000, 33: 186 - 193.
  • 2樊明文.牙体牙髓病学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,150-151.
  • 3陈晖.含漱口泰及1.5%H_2O_2对减少超声洁牙产生的细菌性气雾的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2000,35(5):381-382. 被引量:9
  • 4Ferraz CC,Gomes BP,Zala AA, et al. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant [ J ]. J Endod. 2001,27 (7) : 452 - 455.
  • 5Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, et al. Effectiveness of 2% chlomexidine and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis in bovine root dentine in vitro [J]. lnt Endod J, 2003,6 (4) : 267 - 275.
  • 6Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% cblorhexidine gluconate separately and combined as endodontic irrigants [ J]. J Endod, 1998, 24 (7) :472 - 476.
  • 7Okino LA,Siqueria EL,Santos M, et al. Dissolution of pulp tissue by aqueous solution of chlorhexidine digluconate and chlorhexidine digluconate gel [J]. Int Endod J, 2004, 37 (1) :38 -41.
  • 8Albashaireh ZS, Alnegrish AS. Postobtaratlon pain after single and multiple -visil endodontic therapy. A propective study [ J]. JDent,1998, 26(3) :227 -232.
  • 9李华,郭红延,林红兰,田春娟,冯俊敏.替硝唑根管冲洗液临床效果评价[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2006,16(9):529-530. 被引量:9

二级参考文献7

  • 1唐安尧,史俊南,何通生,赵皿.感染根管内厌氧菌的研究——厌氧菌的分离率及其优势菌[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1989,5(2):105-108. 被引量:30
  • 2Albashaireh ZS,Alnegrish AS.Postobturation pain after single and multiple-visit endodontic therapy.A prospective study[J].J Dent,1998,26(3):227 -232
  • 3Larato DC,Ruskin PF,Martin A,et al.Effect of a dental air turbine drill on the bacterial counts in air[].Journal of Periodontology.1967
  • 4Logothetis DD,Martinez-Welles JM.Reducing bacterial aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate pre-rinse[].The Journal of The American Dental Association.1995
  • 5Veksler AE,Kayrouz GA,Newman MG.Reduction of salivary bacteria by pre-procedural rinses with chlorhexidine 0. 12%[].Journal of Periodontology.1991
  • 6Harrel SK,Barnes JB,Rivera-Hidalgo F.Aerosol and splatter contamination from the operative site during ultrasonic scaling[].The Journal of The American Dental Association.1998
  • 7Bentley CD,Burkhart NW,Crawford JJ.Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures[].The Journal of The American Dental Association.1994

共引文献40

同被引文献41

  • 1徐莉,刘丽君.优质护理服务对宫颈肿瘤综合治疗患者依从性的影响[J].中国误诊学杂志,2021(5):461-462. 被引量:1
  • 2王薇,王志朝.罗红霉素涂膜剂的制备与临床应用[J].中国药业,2006,15(3):47-48. 被引量:8
  • 3李华,郭红延,林红兰,田春娟,冯俊敏.替硝唑根管冲洗液临床效果评价[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2006,16(9):529-530. 被引量:9
  • 4Albashaireh ZS, Alnegrish AS. Postobturation pain after single and multiple - visil endodontic therapy. A propective study[J]. J Dent, 1998,26 ( 3 ) :227 - 232.
  • 5Schwebke J R,Desmond R A.Tinidazole vs metronidazolefor the treatment of bacterial vaginosis[J].Am J ObstetGynecol,2011,204(3):211,e1-e6.
  • 6Armstrong N R,Wilson J D.Tinidazole in the treatment ofbacterial vaginosis[J].Int J Womens Health,2010,1:59-65.
  • 7Granizo J J,Pia Rodicio M,Manso F J,et al.Tinidazole:a classical anaerobical drug with multiple potential usesnowadays[J].Rev Esp Quimioter,2009,22(2):106-114.
  • 8哈英霞,安瑜,姜海山.止痛涂膜的制备工艺研究[J].陕西中医,2007,28(12):1682-1683. 被引量:7
  • 9Pandis N, Papaioannou W, Kontou E, et al. Salivary Streptococcus mu- tans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets [ J ]. Eur J Orthod,2010,32( 1 ) :94-99.
  • 10Marco A, Rinaldo S, Jose G, et al. Comparative effect of an essential oil mouthrinse on plaque, gingivitis and salivary Streptococcus mutanslev- els: a double blind randomized study [ J ]. Phytotherapy Research, 2009,23(9) :1214-1219.

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部