摘要
在《老子注》和《老子指略》中,王弼多次提及"本"、"末",也提出"崇本息末"和"崇本举末"的思想,"息末"和"举末"当然有很大的差距,但是两者并不矛盾。本文从梳理"崇本息末"和"崇本举末"的出处出发,明确两者的同异,接着试比较王弼与老子哲学思想的不同,从方法论的意义上论述两者并不矛盾。
Wang Bi always mentions＂Essentials＂, ＂Superficial＂, ＂Exalting Essentials and Disparaging Superficial＂and ＂Exalting Essentials and Achieving Superficial＂in his kooks such as Laozizhu and Laozizhilue. There are many differences between ＂Disparaging Superficial＂ and ＂Achieving Superficial＂, but they are not contradictory. From the sources of ＂Exalting Essentials and Disparaging Superficial＂and ＂Exalting Essentials and Achieving Superficial＂, this paper clarifies the similarity and difference between them, compares the differences of philosophy between Wang Bi and Laozi, and expounds that they are not contradictory in meaning of methodology.
出处
《重庆教育学院学报》
2010年第1期64-67,共4页
Journal of Chongqing College of Education
关键词
崇本息末
崇本举末
息末
举末
无
Exalting Essentials and Disparaging Superficial
Exalting Essentials and Achieving Superficial
Disparaging Superficial
Achieving Superficial
nothingness
作者简介
梁梅华（1984-），女，广东罗定人，华南师范大学研究生，研究方向：中国哲学与中国教育。
