期刊文献+

大学生人际关系压力应对方式量表的信效度 被引量:14

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Interpersonal Stress-Coping Inventory for undergraduates
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验大学生人际关系压力应对方式量表中文版(Interpersonal Stress-Coping Inventory,ISI)的信效度。方法:整群选取安徽某2所大学学生421名进行测试,被试对ISI和简易应对方式量表(Simplified Coping Style Questionnaira,SCSQ)进行填写,以检验ISI量表的信度和效度,随机抽取52名大学生2周后用ISI重测,以检验重测信度。结果:ISI中文版Cronbach仅系数为0.79,重测信度为0.87,与SCSQ的相关为0.69。通过探索性因素分析,得到积极应对、消极应对、淡化应对3个分量表,因素负荷量为0.41~0.68,解释方差分别为14.82、14.10、7.06。结论:大学生人际关系压力应对方式量表中文版符合心理测量学的要求,可作为我国大学生人际关系压力应对方式的测量工具。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Interpersonal Stress- Coping Inventory for Undergraduates ( ISI) . Methods: Totally 421 college students of 1 -3 grades in two colleges of Anhui province were selected. They were asked to complete the ISI and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire ( SCSQ ) at the same time to test the reliability and validity of ISI. Two weeks later, 52 of them were retested to test the re-test reliability. Results: Cronbach a of the Chinese version of ISI was 0.79, re-test reliability was 0. 87. ISI Scores were correlated with SCSQ scores ( r = 0. 69) . Exploratory factor analysis was applied to the data, and three subscales were derived: positive coping, negative coping, and dilution coping. The factor loadinps were 0. 41 -0. 68. The explained variances were 14. 82, 14. 10, and 7.06 respectively. Conelusion: The Chinese version of Interpersonal Stress-Coping Inventory has good psychometric quality and can be used in Chinese undergraduates of interpersonal stress coping research.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期55-58,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 人际关系压力 应对方式量表 大学生 信度 效度 心理测量学研究 interpersonal stress coping inventory college student reliability validity psychological study
作者简介 通信作者Email:Liming3xy@hotmail.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献24

共引文献2334

同被引文献193

引证文献14

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部