摘要
文书在立法和理论上有最广义、广义和狭义三种含义上的争鸣,狭义文书具有可视性、持续性、联络性和证据性四个特征。关于文书复制件是否属于文书的问题,在外国刑法理论上存在肯定与否定两种观点的对立,我国刑法理论也存在类似争鸣。为了维护罪刑法定原则,我国刑法中的文书应作狭义理解,在文书复制件问题上宜采取否定说。
On documents meaning, there are three kinds of argument, i. e. the widest sense theory, wide sense theory and narrow sense theory. The narrow sense document has the seeablity quality, the successive quality, the contacting quality and the testimony quality. About the topic whether the duplicated documentation are parts of documents, there exist two kinds opposed arguments in foreign and Chinese criminal law. In order to hold the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, the meaning of documents in Chinese criminal law should be taken negative theory.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2009年第4期66-68,共3页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基金
2009年江西省高校人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"伪造文书罪比较研究"(FX0915)的阶段性成果。
关键词
伪造文书罪
文书
复印件
the crime of documents duplication
document
the duplicated document
作者简介
熊永明（1969-），男，江西进贤人，法学博士，南昌大学法学院教授，主要研究方向为刑法学、刑事政策学。
