摘要
本文是曼弗雷德.鲍姆(Manfred Baum)教授2008年10月3日在武汉大学哲学学院所作讲演的译稿。文中对康德《道德形而上学》一书划分成"法权论"和"德行论"的来由、理论根据和基础进行了分析,认为康德摧毁了传统的自然法学说,而把法权和德行全都建立在人的自由之上,视为人的义务的内外两方面。同样作为定言命令,康德的法权原则是分析命题,德行原则是综合命题,前者对人的目的不作要求,后者则要求人把人格和人性当作目的。但法权毕竟要以道德为前提和评价标准,而道德本身的评价标准则是从外部合法性向内部行动"转移"而来的,这是一个矛盾。
This is the translation of the lecture given by Professor Manfred Baum on October 3, 2008 at the School of Philosophy of Wuhan University. He gives an analysis of the source and theoretic basis of the 'doctrine of right' and 'moral philosophy' in Metaphysics of Morals in which Kant abandons the traditional doctrine of natural law and regards right and morality as the internal and external aspects of human liabilities and bases them on the freedom of man. As the categorical imperative, Kant’s 'doctrine of right' is analytic while his 'doctrine of morals' is comprehensive. The former does not require the purpose of man while the latter requires human nature and personality as the purpose. However, right relies on morals as the precondition and assessment criterion while the assessment criterion of morals 'moves' from the external legality to the internal, which leads to a contradiction.
出处
《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期3-10,共8页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
作者简介
曼弗雷德·鲍姆，男，德国乌泊尔大学哲学系教授；
邓晓芒，男，武汉大学哲学学院教授，博士研究生导师。
