期刊文献+

精英意识与大众诉求的调和——刑事司法审判中的民意渗透及限制略论 被引量:6

The Coordination between Elite Consciousness and Popular Appeal
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法审判是实现社会正义的一种主要形式。理想中的司法似乎只为抽象的法律条文、原则和价值服务。然而司法活动总是在一定的时间和空间中发生和进行的,各种社会因素无法从中排除出去,其中,民意对司法审判的巨大压力和影响就是很突出的一例。我国从古至今都有对民意过分偏好的传统,然而由于民意具有非理性、流动性等特点,因此,司法审判与民意之间应该保持一定距离以使其二者之间保持适当张力。 Judicature trial is one of the main forms of realizing social justice. The ideal judicature seems to only serve the abstract legal articles, principles and values. However, the judicial activity always occurs in a certain time and space, and various social factors can not be eliminated. Among them, a very prominent example is public opinion' s great pressure and influence on judicial trial. China has the tradition of taking public opinions too seriously from ancient times till now, because irrationality and fluidity exist in the public opinion, judicatory should be supposed to keep a certain distance from the public opinion to maintain the suitable tension.
出处 《四川文理学院学报》 2009年第6期39-42,共4页 Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
关键词 精英意识 大众诉求 民意 司法审判 elite consciousness popular appeal public opinion judicial judgment
作者简介 [作者简介】戴承欢(1972-),男,湖南常德人,副教授,主要从事法社会学研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1徐迅.法庭新闻的价值取向──兼议“夹江打假案”报道之得失[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),1998,23(1):77-80. 被引量:4
  • 2Brief on Remedy of Amici Curiae Computer and Communications Industry Association and Software and Information Industry Association, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/msdoj/amicus5-19-00.htm.
  • 3Remedies Brief of Amici Curiae, http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/Amicus%20brief%20port.htm.
  • 4Brief of Professor Lawrence Lessig as Amicus Curiae, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/ab.pdf.
  • 5Brief of Professor Lee A Hollaar as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Side, http://digital-law-online.info/papers/lah/ms-amicus.pdf.
  • 6Rule 37 of the Supreme Court of the U.S., http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ctrules/rulesofthecourt.pdf.
  • 7Wayne W. Schmidt, History, purpose and Philosophy of Amieus Advocacy: The AELE Amieus Brief Program, 见http://www.aele.org/history.html.
  • 8Appeals Court Opinion in USA v. Microsoft, June 28, 2001, 见http://www.techlawjoumal.com/courts/dojvmsft2a/20010628op.asp.
  • 9Rule 37(1) of the Supreme Court of the U.S., 见http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ctrules/rulesofthecourt.pdf.
  • 10Amicus Curiae Brief Of Association Of Attomey-Mediators,见 http://www.attomey-mediators.org/amicus1 .html.

共引文献333

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部