摘要
美国宪法修正案第二条在所有的美国宪法条文中行文奇特,模糊不清,从而给解读带来世纪难题。在"持有和携带武器"的权利归属上,就存在截然对立的两种解读方式:"公共权利说"和"个人权利说"。事实上,第二修正案和其他修正案一样,也是谈判、妥协和利益平衡的结果,主要表现在两个层面:首先,它是古典共和主义和激进民主主义的调和与共融;再者就是联邦党人和反联邦党人的相互调和与共融。
It is very difficult to interpret the second amendment to the constitution of United States of America because of its vague working and grammatical structure. There are two different theories concerning the right to carry and bear arms： collective right theory and individual right theory. Actually, the second amendment, like other provisions, is the product of negotiation, compromise and interests-balancing, which is shown at two levels： reconcilement and mergence of classical republicanism and radical democratism; reconcilement and mergence of Federalism and Anti-federalism.
出处
《安徽史学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期44-49,共6页
Historical Research In Anhui
关键词
第二修正案
公共权利说
个人权利说
调和与共融
the second amendment
collective right theory
individual right theory
reconcilement and mergence
作者简介
江振春（1971-），男，安徽安庆人，南京大学历史学系博士生，南京审计学院外国语学院副教授。
