摘要
心理治疗结果研究中,如何对结果测量数据进行统计分析,是非常重要的环节之一。研究者发现,不能简单使用统计显著性来考察心理治疗的结果,因而引入了临床显著性的概念以便更准确地从临床角度考察治疗的情况。在验证临床显著性改变中,西方学者提出了JT法、GLN法、EN法和HA法等统计分析方法,这些方法都试图更准确地分析临床显著性,但在心理治疗结果研究中,这些方法仍然存在概念明确性、标准和数据收集完善性等方面的问题。因此今后的研究应该关注方法的创新或修订,还是关注数据解释是目前西方关于临床显著性分析方法的两大争论。国内也应在心理治疗结果的研究中引入临床显著性分析方法,同时还应考虑效果评价指标的设立和有效测量工具编制的问题,为正确评价心理治疗结果服务,并最终为提高心理治疗效果服务。
It is a key link in the study of psychotherapy outcomes that how to analyze the outcomes measure data. In the course of the study, the researchers found that the statistical significance methods used to were problematic. Therefore the concept of clinical significance was introduced in evaluating treatment efficacy. Western scholars have put forth the JT, GLN, EN and HA to verify the clinical significant change of clients. These methods were trying to afford the accurate information, however some issues still exist in the study of psychotherapy outcomes, such as the clarity of the concept, the integrity of the standards and data collection. Future research should focus on innovating or amending methods, or concern about the data interpretation is the currently two arguments. Our country should fetch in the clinical significance methods in consideration of the establishment of evaluating indicators and measurement tools, in order to evaluate the psychotherapy outcomes correctly and to enhance the efficacy of psychotherapy finally.
出处
《心理科学进展》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第5期1002-1009,共8页
Advances in Psychological Science
基金
教育部重大攻关招标课题"中国心理健康服务体系现状及对策研究"(05JZD00031)
西南大学国家重点学科建设基金重大课题"时间人格的健康心理学研究"(NSKD06011)
关键词
心理治疗
结果评价
临床显著性
统计分析
psychotherapy
outcome assessment
clinical significance
statistical method
作者简介
通讯作者：郑涌，E-mail：zhengy@swll．edu.cn
