期刊文献+

表象—认知吝啬原则:MHD问题另释 被引量:6

The Mental Image Representation Underlying the Law of Parsimony:Interpreting the MHD in Another Way
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先对MHD问题的研究现状进行了简要回顾,然后对MHD问题中出现的"概率错判"和"选择固着"两种现象给出了一种基于表象—认知吝啬视角的解释。该视角认为,人们无论采用的是顺向表征还是逆向表征,都采用了动态表象表征问题,而依照认知吝啬原则,动态表象要模拟轿车在门1、门2之间以1:2的比率出现的状态很难,却极容易模拟成轿车在门1门2间随机出现的状态;这导致了人们形成"概率错判";对于"选择固着"问题该视角则认为,它的出现是不变比改变更符合认知吝啬原则的结果。 A new interpretation of the MHD is given in this paper. According to it, most of the people are supposed to represent the MHD by mental image and obey the law of parsimony in their representation; Based on the two of these, people can only represent the MHD by dynamic mental image in the first stage of the problem, i.e., people can only imagine that the car appears randomly among the three doors; And at the second stage of the problem, people can also only imagine that the car appears randomly between the two doors which were left for the same reasons; though, they should have imagined that the car appears between the two doors underlying the ratio of 1:2. That is why the reasoning illusion exists.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期893-900,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(30800297) 高等学校省级优秀青年人才基金项目(2009SQRS025) 安徽师范大学青年基金项目(2008xqn2008)资助 安徽师范大学学校心理学创新团队建设成果
关键词 MHD问题 认知吝啬原则 表象表征 MHD the law of parsimony mental image representation
作者简介 通讯作者:李小平,E-mail:lxpjq@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献76

  • 1GerdGigerenzer,包燕.生态学智力:人类的推理算法对频率的适应[J].心理学动态,2001,9(4):325-329. 被引量:4
  • 2刘永芳,Gerd Gigerenzer,Peter M.Todd.快速节俭启发式——基于有限理性和生态理性的简单决策规则[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):56-59. 被引量:30
  • 3傅小兰,赵晓东.信息表征形式对解决贝叶斯推理问题的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):109-115. 被引量:13
  • 4邱江,张庆林.Monty Hall Dilemma的困难原因探讨[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):222-224. 被引量:5
  • 5Tubau E,Alonso D. Overcoming illusory inferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: the role of explicit representations.Memory & Cognition, 2003,31(4) :596 - 607.
  • 6Johnson - Laird P N, Legrenzi P. Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 1999, 106(1) :62- 88.
  • 7Granberg D, Brown T A. The Monty Hall dilemma. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995,21:711 - 723.
  • 8Burns B D, Wieth M. The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the monty hall dihmma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2004,133(3) :434 - 449.
  • 9Krauss S, Wang X T. The psychology of the monty hall problem:Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 2003, 132 ( 1 ) :3 - 22.
  • 10Goldstein D G, Gigerenzer G. Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic. Psychological Review, 2002,109( 1 ) :75 - 90.

共引文献160

同被引文献39

  • 1李小平,张庆林.抽象材料选择任务的表象表征视角[J].心理学探新,2006,26(2):31-33. 被引量:2
  • 2马西莫,皮亚里·泊尔马里尼.理性的错觉如何控制我们的思维[M].欧阳绛,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2005:15-137.
  • 3KRAUSS S, WANG X T. The psychology of the monty hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2003, 132 ( 1 ) : 3-22.
  • 4BURNS B D, WIETH M. The collide principle in causal reaso- nning: why the monty hall dilemma is so hard[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133 ( 3 ) : 434-449.
  • 5GIGERENZER G, HOFFRAGE U. How to improve bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats[J]. Psychological Review, 1995, 102: 684-704.
  • 6HOFFRAGE U, GIGERENZER G. Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences[J]. Academic, Medicine, 1998, 73: 538-540.
  • 7ZHU L, GIGERENZER G Children can solve bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation[J]. Cognition, 2006, 98 (3): 287-308.
  • 8HOFFRAGE U, GIGERENZER G. Overcoming difficulties in bayesian reasoning: a reply to lewis and keren and meilers and mcgraw [J]. Psychological Review, 1999, 106( 2 ) : 425-430.
  • 9HOFFRAGE U, GIGERENZER G, KRAUSS S, et al. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not[J]. Cognition, 2002, 84 ( 3 ) : 343-352.
  • 10刘立秋,陆勇.Linda问题:“齐当别”抉择模型的解释[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):735-742. 被引量:7

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部