期刊文献+

《国家学生体质健康标准》与《学生体质健康标准(试行方案)》的比较研究 被引量:56

Comparative Study of National Students Constitutional Health Criterion and Students Constitutional Health Criterion(on trial)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对6517名大学生的身高标准体重、肺活量、坐位体前屈、台阶试验、立定跳远等测试项目进行《学生体质健康标准(试行方案)》(简称《老标准》)与《国家学生体质健康标准》(简称《新标准》)的评价比较,探讨了《新标准》在测试项目、权重系数、评价等级、评分标准等方面的合理性与科学性。结果表明,《新标准》中测试内容更加丰富,但选测项目仍然分类不清;权重系数的分配更加合理;评价等级的调整幅度较小,但评分标准大幅提高,学生的体质健康测试数据反映出新老标准间的各等级通过率存在非常显著的差异,采用《新标准》评价的不及格比例明显增大,从原来的0.3%提高到23.9%,而优良比例却由原来的60.2%降低到27.5%。因此,建议对《新标准》中部分项目的评分标准进行进一步的完善和优化。 Through the comparison of the evaluation of "Students Constitutional Health Criterion (on trial)" (old standard for short) and "National Students Constitutional Health Criterion "( new standard for short) on the 6 517 college students ' height standard weight, vital capacity, crook before the seat body, step test, standing long jump, this paper has carried out a dis- cussion on the rationality and scientific nature of test items, weight coefficient, estimation scale and marking criterion of the new standard. The result shows that the test items of the new standard are richer than those of the old one, but the classification of the selective-test items of the new standard is still confusing;the distribution of weight coefficient of the new standard is more rational than that of the old one;the new standard makes minor adjustment to estimation scale, but steeply raises marking criterion, the test data of the students ~ physical fitness re- fleets the significant difference of the rate of each grade between the new standard with the old one , the rate of fail evaluated by the new standard is raised from 0.3 % to 23.9 % markedly, while the rate of excellence and good is reduced from 60.2% to 27.5 %. Therefore, it is sug- gested that the marking criterion of some items of the new standard should be further perfected and optimized.
出处 《体育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期92-96,共5页 China Sport Science
关键词 《国家学生体质健康标准》 《学生体质健康标准(试行方案)》 测试项目 权重系数 评价等级 评分标准 National Students Constitutional Health Criterion Students Constitutional Health Criterion (on trial ) test items weight coefficient estimation scale marking criterion
作者简介 作者简介:郑殷珏(1983-),女,浙江临海人,助理实验师,研究方向为运动人体科学,E-mail:yingjuex@126.com; 方爱莲(1955-),女,浙江临海人,教授,研究方向为体育教育与运动训练理论与方法、体育社会学,E-mail:fangailian@126.com,; 蔡金明(1967-),男,浙江临海人,副教授,研究方向为体育教学和武术理论,E-mail:cjm5152@tzc.edu.cn; 邓蜀李(1958-),女,北京人,副教授,研究方向为体育保健。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

共引文献160

同被引文献460

引证文献56

二级引证文献330

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部