期刊文献+

封闭的基督徒与单方受益的儒耶对话——以黄保罗的研究为例 被引量:4

Narrow-minded Christian and Unilateral-beneficial Dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity:Taking Dr.Paulos Huang’s Studies for Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 Since Christianity is closely related to the history of modern China and increasing rapidly in contemporary China, and resulting in many problems, the dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity is still of reality, importance and urgency. As one of the representative works in this field, Dr. Paulos Huang’s doctoral dissertation is rather valuable. Nevertheless, the issue of salvation which he sets for the dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity is not a nuclear one for both sides, but rather a trap by which he replaces Confucianism with Christianity. The historical dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity he demonstrates in his dissertation is a unilateral-beneficial one in which only Confucianism had learned very much from Christianity, and the later had not found any useful ideas in Confucianism to enrich itself. Huang’s summary of elements positive and negative to the dialogue manifests that he is not an open-minded Christian. As a matter of fact, the openness of Confucianism to Christianity is one of the most important elements for promoting the dialogue. Since Christianity is closely related to the history of modern China and increasing rapidly in contemporary China, and resulting in many problems, the dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity is still of reality, importance and urgency. As one of the representative works in this field, Dr. Paulos Huang’s doctoral dissertation is rather valuable. Nevertheless, the issue of salvation which he sets for the dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity is not a nuclear one for both sides, but rather a trap by which he replaces Confucianism with Christianity. The historical dialogue between Confucianism and Christianity he demonstrates in his dissertation is a unilateral-beneficial one in which only Confucianism had learned very much from Christianity, and the later had not found any useful ideas in Confucianism to enrich itself. Huang’s summary of elements positive and negative to the dialogue manifests that he is not an open-minded Christian. As a matter of fact, the openness of Confucianism to Christianity is one of the most important elements for promoting the dialogue.
作者 孙尚扬
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期51-57,共7页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1贝拉 孙尚扬译.《宗教与美利坚共和国的正当性》[J].道风汉语神学学刊,1997,.
  • 2高攀龙.2005年.《钦定四库全书·高子遗书》卷八上《与管东溟二》,台北迪志文化出版有限公司.
  • 3柯文.2002年.《在中国发现历史--中国中心观在美国的兴起》,林同奇译,中华书局.
  • 4尼特.2004年.《宗教对话模式》,王志成译,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 5孙尚扬.《基督教与明末儒学》.东方出版社,1996年,第7—8页,第8页.
  • 6孙尚扬.2007年.《如切如磋,砥砺相生》,载胡军,孙尚扬主编.《探寻真善美》,北京大学出版社.
  • 7《天主教东传文献续编》.台北学生书局1986年版.
  • 8韦伯.《新教伦理与资本主义精神》,三联书店,1996年版,第14页.
  • 9Huang, Paulos, 2006, Confronting Confucian Understandings of the Christian Doctrine of Salvation A Systematic Theological Analysis of the Basic Problems in the Confucian-Christian Dialogue, printed by Edita Prima Oy, Finland: Helsinki.

共引文献8

同被引文献38

  • 1潘旭澜.洪秀全的政治性邪教[J].江汉论坛,2006(3):111-113. 被引量:3
  • 2王小明.拜上帝会的宗教思想与民间信仰[J].湖北教育学院学报,2006,23(6):53-54. 被引量:1
  • 3何军新.从儒家的叛逆到基督的叛逆——洪秀全意识结构的内在矛盾[J].湖南城市学院学报,2007,28(1):70-73. 被引量:3
  • 4尼特.2004年.《宗教对话模式》,王志成译,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 5黄保罗,2008年b.《系统神学分析法及其对汉语学术神学的意义》,载《二十一世纪全球化中的基督教及其与中国文化的会通学术会议论文及摘要》,武汉大学哲学学院及欧美宗教文化研究所.
  • 6潘尼卡,2001年.《宗教内对话》,王志成,思竹译,宗教文化出版社.
  • 7斯密斯,2005年.《宗教的意义和终结》,董江阳译,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 8王志成 朱彩虹.《儒耶对话走向何方?--简评黄保罗<儒家、基督宗教与救赎>》[J].道风:基督教文化评论,2009,(31).
  • 9希克,2005年.《多名的上帝》,王志成译,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 10卓新平,2009年.《新视野中的对话神学--论黄保罗关于儒基对话的贡献》,载黄保罗《儒家、基督宗教与救赎--附十八篇汉语学术神学对话与述评》,宗教文化出版社.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部