期刊文献+

68例腹腔镜活体供肾切取术的临床研究 被引量:7

Clinical study of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy:a report of 68 cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结68例腹腔镜活体供肾切取术(laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy,LDN)的临床经验。方法:回顾分析2004年5月至2008年4月我院施行的LDN68例的临床资料,对手术时间,供肾热缺血时间,术中失血量,肾动、静脉长度进行统计,并对数据按照取左、右肾进行分组比较。根据改良的Clavien分级系统对围手术期并发症情况进行分析。术后对供者血肌酐(SCr),肾小球滤过率(GFR),24h尿蛋白定量水平,血压水平以及受者的肾功能情况进行随访。结果:68例LDN手术均取得成功,手术时间为(87.5±7.8)min,供肾热缺血时间为(85.6±13.1)s,术中失血量为(56.8±8.5)ml,肾动脉长度为(3.0±0.3)cm,肾静脉长度为(2.3±0.3)cm,按照取左右肾手术时间分别为(89.5±8.4)min和(86.8±7.2)min(P>0.05),供肾热缺血时间为(86.7±12.3)s和(85.2±14.1)s(P>0.05),术中失血量为(58.2±10.2)ml和(55.4±9.4)ml,(P>0.05),肾动脉长度为(2.5±0.3)cm和(3.5±0.3)cm(P<0.0001),肾静脉长度为(3.2±0.4)cm和(1.6±0.3)cm(P<0.0001)。围手术期3例(4.4%)出现并发症,其中Grade2b级1例,Grade1级2例。肾移植手术均获成功,受者在1周内肾功恢复正常,1例受者术后6个月并发肺部感染死亡。供者术后SCr,24h尿蛋白定量水平,GFR值维持在正常范围内,无新发高血压患者出现。结论:LDN安全、微创,完善LDN操作技术,加强对供者术后随访十分重要。 Objective: To summarize our clinical experiences of 68 cases with laparoseopic live donor nephreetomy (LDN). Methods:Sixty-eight cases of LDN from May 2004 to Apr. 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Data of operation time, donor warm ischemic time, blood loss, vessel length were collected and compared between left and right kidney groups. The procedure-related complications were analyzed according to the modified Clavien classification system. Data from recipients and donors were collected from medical and follow-up records. Serum ereatinine levels (Scr), 24-hour urine protein excretion, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood pressure of donors and Scr of recipients were followed up postoperatively. Results: All cases of LDN were successfully accomplished, mean operation time was (87. 5 ± 7. 8 ) rain, mean donor warm isehemic time was (85. 6 ± 13. 1 ) s, mean blood loss was (56. 8± 8. 5 ) ml, mean artery length was ( 3. 0 ± 0. 3 ) cm, mean vein length was ( 2. 3 ±0. 3 ) cm. For left and right LDN, mean operation time was (89. 5 ±8.4)rain and (86. 8±7. 2)rain respectively (P 〉0. 05) ,mean donor warm ischemic time was (86. 7 ± 12. 3)s and (85. 2 ±14. 1 ) s respectively ( P 〉 0. 05 ), mean blood loss Was ( 58. 2 ± 10. 2 ) ml and ( 55.4± 9. 4 ) ml respectively ( P 〉 0. 05 ), mean artery length was (2.5 ±0. 3)cm and (3. 5 ±0. 3)cm respectively (P 〈0. 0001 ) ,mean vein length was (3. 2 ±0. 4)cm and ( 1.6 ±0. 3)era respectively (P 〈0. 0001 ). Perioperative complications included 1 case of Grade 2b and 2 case of Grade 1 with a total complications rate of 4. 4%. All the transplantations were successfully completed, Scr returned to normal level within 1 week after the operation in all the recipients. One recipient died of the post transplantation pneumonia 6 months after the transplantation. Levels of Scr,24-hour urine protein excretion and GFR of all donors maintained in normal condition and without new hypertension patient in donors during follow- up. Conclusions: LDN is safe and minimally invasive, it is erocial to improve the technique of LDN and intensify the follow-up work of kidney donors.
机构地区 烟台毓璜顶医院
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2009年第2期91-93,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜术 肾移植 活体供者 随访 Laparosopy Kidney transplantation Living donors Follow-up
作者简介 赵俊杰(1976-)男,烟台毓璜顶医院泌尿外科主治医师,主要从事微创泌尿外科及肾移植方面的研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, et al. A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy [ J ]. Transplantation, 2004,78 (3) :404-414.
  • 2Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, et al. Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complicati0r~s of living kidney donation [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2006,243( 1 ) :126-130.
  • 3高振利 王科 刘庆祚 等.腹腔镜下活体供肾切取手术路径选择.中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(1):17-20.
  • 4Dekel Y, Mor E. Hem-O-lock clip dislodgment causing death of the donor after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy[ J ]. Trans- plantation,2008,86 (6) : 887.
  • 5Schuster TG, Wolf JS Jr. Use of bipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy[ J]. J Urol, 2001,165 (6 Pt 1 ) : 1968-1970.
  • 6Constant DL, Florman SS, Mendez F, et al. Use of the LigaSure vessel sealing device in laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy [ J ]. Transplantation,2004,78 ( 11 ) : 1661-1664.
  • 7苏华,王永来.超声刀和结扎速血管闭合系统闭合血管的可靠性及组织损伤程度研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(5):489-491. 被引量:50
  • 8Rao MM, Russell CH, Padmakar NP, et al. Transection of the renal pelvis by endocatch bag during laparoseopic donor nephrectomy[J]. Surg Laparose Endosc Percutan Tech,2008,18(4) :429-432.
  • 9高振利,赵俊杰,孙德康,柳东夫,王琳,杨典东,姜仁慧,王建明,石磊,万峰春,方艳丽,王科.腹腔镜与开放手术活体取肾供者1年随访研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(9):598-602. 被引量:1

二级参考文献15

  • 1苏华,王永来.几种医疗止血器械在腹腔镜手术中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(8):108-110. 被引量:8
  • 2Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, et al. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology, 2006, 67:927-931.
  • 3Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg, 1997, 226: 483-490.
  • 4Delmonico F. Council of the Transplantation Society. A report of the Amsterdam Forum on the care of the live kidney donor: data and medical guidelines. Transplantation, 2005, 79 (6 Suppl) :S53-66.
  • 5Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Jawad F, et al. Living kidney donor follow up in a dedicated clinic. Transplantation, 2005, 79:1247-1251.
  • 6Lind MY, Zur Borg IM, Hazebroek EJ, et al. The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephreetomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: a retrospective study. Transplantation, 2005, 80 : 700-703.
  • 7Haberal M, Karakayali H, Moray G, et al. Long-term follow-up of 102 living kidney donors. Clin Nephrol, 1998, 50:232-235.
  • 8高振利 王科 刘庆祚 等.腹腔镜下活体供肾切取手术路径选择.中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(1):17-20.
  • 9HEILI MJ,FLOWERS SA,FOWLER DL.Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy:a comparison of dissection[J].JSLS,1999,3 (1):27-31.
  • 10TULANDI T,BUGNAH M.Operation laparoscopy:surgical modalities[J].Fertil steril,1995,63:237-245.

共引文献52

同被引文献37

  • 1朱晓明,熊汝成,张元芳,张永康.改进的犬异体肾移植术[J].上海实验动物科学,1994,14(2):90-92. 被引量:6
  • 2刘雄友,明英姿,叶少军,黄湘华,叶启发.不同亲属供肾肾移植临床疗效观察[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(8):1220-1222. 被引量:7
  • 3王玉杰,刘明,安恒庆.一种改进的大鼠肾移植模型[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(5):631-632. 被引量:7
  • 4刘忠国,温端改,潘浩,欧阳骏,王祖峰.改良性大鼠同种异体肾移植模型的建立[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(6):756-756. 被引量:7
  • 5Iaria M, Capocasale E, Dalla Valle R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. An appraisal on surgical outcome and post-opera- tive course. Ann Ital Chir, 2009,80:449-451.
  • 6Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, et al. Laparoscopic living-donor ne- phrectomy : analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol,2010 ,58 :498- 509.
  • 7Hanto DW, Maki T, Yoon MH, et al. Intraoperative administration of inhaled carbon monoxide reduces delayed graft function in kidney al- lografts in Swine. Am J Transplant,2010,10:2421-2430.
  • 8Azuma H, Isaka Y, Nomi H, et al. Induction of donor-specific toler- ance using superagonistic CD28 antibody in rat renal allografts:regu- latory T-cell expansion before engraftment may be important. Trans- plantation, 2010,90 : 1328 -1335.
  • 9Minnee RC, Idu MM. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Neth J Med, 2010,68 : 199-206.
  • 10Leventhal JR, Paunescu S, Baker TB, et al. A decade of minimally in- vasive donation: experience with more than 1200 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies at a single institution. Clin Transplant , 2010 , 24 :169- 174.

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部