期刊文献+

MRI对软组织肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的诊断价值 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MR I对软组织肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的诊断价值。方法分析62个软组织肿块的MR I表现特点,并与最后诊断结果进行比较。结果MR I对软组织肿块的检出率为100%,对良、恶性肿瘤的定性诊断符合率分别为95.3%和94.7%,组织学诊断符合率分别为90.7%和31.6%(P<0.05)。结论MR I对于软组织肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的诊断具有非常重要的意义。
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2009年第2期199-201,共3页 Guangxi Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献27

  • 1常英娟,魏光全,赵海涛,刘燕丽,葛雅丽,郑敏文,张劲松,杨春敏.动态对比增强MRI诊断<5mm垂体微腺瘤的应用研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(12):1057-1059. 被引量:10
  • 2王秀河,黄耀熊,黄力,刘斯润.动态增强MRI在垂体微腺瘤诊断中的应用研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(3):202-205. 被引量:21
  • 3霍钢,郑履平,唐文渊.垂体腺瘤侵袭海绵窦的MRI判定标准[J].第四军医大学学报,2007,28(8):711-713. 被引量:9
  • 4[1]Berquist TH,Ehman RL,King BF,et al.Value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses:study of 95 lesions[J].AJR,1990,155(12):1251-1255.
  • 5[2]Kransdorf MJ,Jelinek JS,Moser RP Jr,et al.Soft-tissue masses:diagnosis using MR imaging[J].AJR,1989,153(9):541-547.
  • 6[3]Crim JR,Seeger LL,Yao L,et al.Diagnosis of soft tissue masses with MR imaging:can benign masses be differentiated from malignant ones?[J].Radiology,1992,185(2):581-586.
  • 7[4]Moulton JS,Blebea JS,Dunco DM,et al.MR imaging of soft-tissue masses:diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions[J].AJR,1995,164(5):1191-1199.
  • 8[5]Hermann G,Abdelwahab LF,Miller TT,et al.Tumour and tumour-like conditions of the soft tissue:magnetic resonance imaging features differentiating benign from malignant masses[J].The Br J of Radiol,1992,65(1):14-20.
  • 9[6]Wetzel LH,Levine E.Soft-tissue tumors of the foot:value of MR imaging for specific diagnosis[J].AJR,1990,155(11):1025-1030.
  • 10[7]Weinberger E,Shaw DWW,White KS,et al.Nontraumatic pediatric musculoskeletal MR imaging:comparison of conventional and fast-spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery technique[J].Radiology,1995,194(3):721-726.

共引文献55

同被引文献25

  • 1崔晓琳,程敬亮,任翠萍,张炎,刘依凝,石士奎.软组织海绵状血管瘤的MRI诊断[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(3):371-373. 被引量:13
  • 2Burgener EA,Mayers SP,Tan SK,等.磁共振成像鉴别诊断学[M].郭启勇,译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2007:34-35.
  • 3Castellazzi G. Vanel D, Le Casne A,et al. Can the MRI signal of aggressive fibromatosis be used to predict its behavior[J]. Eur J Radiol 2009,69 (2) : 222-229.
  • 4Hartman TE,Berquist THo Fetseh JF. MR imaging of extraab- dominal desmoids differentiation [rom other neoplasms[J].&JR, 1992,158(3) : 581-585.
  • 5Kav4ashima H,Ogose A, Gu W, et al. Eatahlishment and eharac terization of a novel myxofibrosarcoma cell line[J]. Canecer Genet Cytogenet, 2005,161(1) :28-35.
  • 6Lefkowitz RA, Landa J, Hwang S, et al. Myxofibrosareoma : prev- alence and diagnostic value of the "tail sign" on magnetic reso- nance imaging[J]. Skeletal Radiol,2013,42(6) :809-818.
  • 7Sidi V, Fragandrea I, Hatzipantelis E, et al. Alveolar so{t-part sarcoma of the extremity a case report[J]. Hippokratia, 2008,12 (4) :251-253.
  • 8Park MY,Jee WH, Kim SK, et al. Preliminary experience using dynamic MRI at 3. 0Tesla for evaluation of soft tissue tumors [J]. Korean J Radio1,2013,]4(1) :102-109.
  • 9Hussein R, Smith MA. Soft tissue sarcomas:are current referral guidelines sufficient [ J ]. Ann R Coil Surg Eng1,2005,87 (3) :171 - 173.
  • 10Mouhon JS,Blebea JS,Dunco DM,et al. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses :diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between be- gin and malignant lesion [ J ]. A JR, 1995,164 ( 5 ) : 1191 - 1199.

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部