期刊文献+

脑外伤所致精神障碍伤残鉴定时机 被引量:23

Assessment Time on Mental Disability Due to Brain Damage
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究脑外伤所致精神障碍伤残相对合理准确的最佳鉴定时机。方法对93例交通事故脑外伤所致精神障碍患者进行伤残鉴定及随访调查,在伤后不同时间段(3、6、9、12月)分别收集患者颅脑影像学、脑电图及详细病史资料,并对患者家属进行调查和对患者进行精神检查及智力量表(Wechsler Intellegence Scale for Adult,WAIS)、社会功能缺陷筛选量表(Social Disability Screening Schedule,SDSS)和日常生活能力量表(Activity of Daily Living Scale,ADL)测验,据此进行诊断及评残。结果ADL、SDSS对不同等级伤残及不同时间段区分良好,整体样本显示患者ADL、SDSS平均值9月与12月无差别,轻度伤残ADL、SDSS平均值6、9、12月无差别,中度伤残ADL、SDSS平均值9月与12月无差别,重度伤残ADL平均值6、9、12月无差别。结论脑外伤所致精神障碍伤残鉴定轻度伤残以伤后6个月评定为宜,中度伤残以伤后9个月评定为宜,重度伤残统计结论显示评残时机为伤后6个月,但综合分析认为重度伤残以伤后9个月评定为宜。 Objective To determine the best time for assessing mental disability due to brain damage. Methods Ninety-three mental disabilities due to brain damage in traffic accidents were assessed and their follow-up studies were taken in different period after the brain injury: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. The patients' brain imaging, electroencephalogram(EEG) and detailed medical history were collected. Then to interview the patients' family members and to assess the patients' mental conditions with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Seale(WAIS), Social Disability Screening Schedule(SDSS), and Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL). Diagnosis and disability assessments were based on all of the above information. Results ADL and SDSS had good distinction between different levels of disability and different time. The overall sample demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between patients' ADL and SDSS averages in 9 and 12 months. For mild disability, there was no statistically significant difference between ADL and SDSS averages in 6, 9 and 12 months. For moderate disability, there was no statistically significant difference between ADL and SDSS in 9 and 12 months. And there was no statistically significant difference between ADL and SDSS averages in 6, 9 and 12 months for severe disability. Conclusion For mild disability, it is recommended to assess the mental disability 6 months after the injury, for moderate disability, it is 9 months. The statistics data recommended that the best assessment time for severe disability is 6 months after injury. However, our comprehensive analysis concludes that the suitable time is 9 months after injury.
出处 《法医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2009年第1期27-32,共6页 Journal of Forensic Medicine
关键词 司法精神病学 精神障碍 脑损伤 事故 交通 残疾鉴定 日常生活能力量表 社会功能缺陷筛选量表 forensic psychiatry mental disorders brain injuries accidents, traffic disability evaluation ADL SDSS
作者简介 汤涛(1966-),男,上海人。副主任法医师,主要从事司法精神病鉴定与研究。Tel:021—52361148—2610。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1沈渔邨.精神病学[M].第4版.北京:人民教育出版社,2003:103-457.
  • 2中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)[S].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:151-152.
  • 3高北陵,陆亚文,胡赤怡,唐卓如,杨彤.重型颅脑损伤患者精神障碍的临床分析[J].中华精神科杂志,2001,34(4):215-218. 被引量:80
  • 4马光瑜,张秦初,陈培纯.颅脑损伤与人格障碍的关系研究[J].法律与医学杂志,1999,6(4):148-150. 被引量:12
  • 5万海涛,徐涛,宋雷,顾斌贤,杨继宗.急性闭合性颅脑损伤康复早期精神障碍分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2001,27(1):47-48. 被引量:51
  • 6Achte KA 顾牛范(译).脑外伤引起的精神病[J].国外医学:精神病学分册,1976,3:131-134.
  • 7Sachdev P, Smith JS, Cathcart S. Schizophrenia-like psychosis following traumatic brain injury: a chartbased descriptive and case-control study[J]. Psychol Med,2001,31 (2) :231-239.
  • 8Dikmen S, McLean A, Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1986,49(11 ) : 1227-1232.

二级参考文献17

  • 1裘法祖.外科学(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991.183-184.
  • 2史玉泉.实用神经病学(第二版)[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994.648.
  • 3贾谊诚.实用司法精神病学[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,1998.260-268.
  • 4太田幸雄 张庆豪(译).头部外伤后精神病学表现[J].国外医学:精神病学分册,1978,5(1):12-12.
  • 5吕志中.精神病院在所见的脑外伤精神障碍[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1982,15:150-152.
  • 6羌明伟 梅其一.脑外伤后躁狂发作2例报告[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1991,17:308-308.
  • 7沈政 郑瞻培 等.法律精神病学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1989.231-234.
  • 8丁铭臣,神经系统疾病学,1995年,18页
  • 9史玉泉,实用神经病学(第2版),1994年,791页
  • 10刘明铎,实用颅脑损伤学,1992年,453页

共引文献167

同被引文献139

引证文献23

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部