期刊文献+

Civil Society的近现代演变及其理论转型 被引量:8

The Evolution of Modern Civil Society and Its Theoretical Transformation
原文传递
导出
摘要 The civil society separated from political state was born in modern bourgeois revolution,but its political functions did not disappear after the revolution as some scholars ever asserted. Hegel and Marx have pointed out the limitations of civil society and clarified its economic functions. With the development of history,some scholars,such as Gramsci,Habermas and Dahrendorf,not only put great emphasis on political and cultural significance of civil society,but also increasingly clarified its internal structure divisions,and thus established the category of "Gongmin Shehui". Nowadays,civil society contains multiple implications of "Shimin Shehui","Gongmin Shehui" and "Wenmin Shehui" ,and so on. The meaning of "Gongmin Shehui" is typical prominent. The theory of civil society develops with realities,and its vitality and explanatory power is also growing. The civil society separated from political state was born in modern bourgeois revolution,but its political functions did not disappear after the revolution as some scholars ever asserted. Hegel and Marx have pointed out the limitations of civil society and clarified its economic functions. With the development of history,some scholars,such as Gramsci,Habermas and Dahrendorf,not only put great emphasis on political and cultural significance of civil society,but also increasingly clarified its internal structure divisions,and thus established the category of 'Gongmin Shehui'. Nowadays,civil society contains multiple implications of 'Shimin Shehui','Gongmin Shehui' and 'Wenmin Shehui' ,and so on. The meaning of 'Gongmin Shehui' is typical prominent. The theory of civil society develops with realities,and its vitality and explanatory power is also growing.
作者 周俊 郁建兴
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期80-88,共9页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1贝克.2000年:《公民社会和民主:理论和可能性之间的差距》,载何增科编《公民社会与第三部门》,社会科学文献出版社.
  • 2伯恩斯坦.《社会主义的前提和社会民主党的任务》[M].三联书店,1965..
  • 3陈晏清,王新生.市民社会观念的当代演变及其意义[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(6):29-37. 被引量:35
  • 4达伦道夫.《现代社会冲突》.中国社会科学出版社,2000年版第94页.
  • 5方朝晖.市民社会的两个传统及其在现代的汇合[J].中国社会科学,1994(5):82-102. 被引量:78
  • 6葛兰西 雷雨 姜丽 张跣译.《狱中札记》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2000年.234页.
  • 7哈贝马斯 刘北成 曹卫东译.《合法化危机》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年.第47、3、5页.
  • 8哈贝马斯 童世骏译.《在事实与规范之间》[M].北京:三联书店,2003年.第514页.
  • 9何增科.2007年:《民主化的希望还是偶像》,载《公民社会与民主治理》,中央编译出版社.
  • 10赫尔德,等.2001年:《全球大变革:全球化时代的政治、经济和文化》,社会科学文献出版社.

二级参考文献73

  • 1Valerie Bunce,王正绪(译),方瑞丰(译).民主化比较研究:一些广泛的和局部性的结论[J].开放时代,2006(5):65-91. 被引量:4
  • 2А.斯捷姆佩尼-库钦斯卡,А.格洛瓦茨基,Б.А.博戈莫洛夫,К.库比亚克,侯静娜.中东欧国家社会政治转型的经验——俄罗斯与波兰学者笔谈摘录[J].经济社会体制比较,2006(6):50-56. 被引量:2
  • 3恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源.马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].人民出版社,1972..
  • 4西塞罗.《论共和国论法律》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1997年版.第192页.
  • 5恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1972..
  • 6亨利·皮雷纳,陈国樑译.《中世纪的城市》.北京:商务印书馆,1985年.第35页.
  • 7威廉斯.《关键词:文化与社会的词汇》.刘建基译,北京:三联书店,2005年.第43-44页.
  • 8皮朗.《中世纪欧洲经济社会史》.乐文译,上海:上海人民出版社,2001年.第173页.
  • 9Antony Black, Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present, London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1984, p. 10.
  • 10Antony Black, Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present, p. 34.

共引文献691

同被引文献125

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部