摘要
《刑法修正案(六)》第3条关于"直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员"这一规范内容的立法原意与文义理解存在一定程度的偏差。在短期内,可由最高司法机关颁布相应的司法解释对本罪中的范围作适当的扩大解释,将"雇主和主要负责人(法定代表人)"等主体解释在内。从长远来看,则应对立法作相应的修改完善。在单位前任直接负责的主管人员举办大型群众性活动的过程中违反安全管理规定但重大伤亡事故或者其他严重后果却发生在其后任直接负责的主管人员任内的情况下,仍可追究单位中"其他直接责任人员"犯本罪的刑事责任。
The subject of the crime should include the criminal unit. There is deviation between legislation original idea and meaning understanding in Article 3 of Amendment 6 to the Criminal Law that is about ＂direct directors in charge and other direct personnel on duty＂. In short term, the supreme judicial organ can promulgate corresponding judicial interpretation on the range of ＂direct directors in charge and other direct personnel on duty＂which can be interpreted into ＂employers and chief directors （legal representative）＂. In long term, the legislation should be amended and improved. In the unit former direct directors held large mass activities in which safety management regulations were violated but the serious casualty accidents or other serious aftereffects took place in the period of the latter directors, which can investigate＂other direct personnel on duty＂criminal responsibility.
出处
《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》
2008年第4期19-23,共5页
Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
关键词
大型群众性活动重大安全事故罪
主体
刑法修正案(六)
crime for serious safety accident in large mass activities
subject
amendment 6 to the criminal law
作者简介
彭新林（1983-），男，湖南湘乡人，北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院2007级刑法学专业博士研究生．主要从事刑法学研究。
