摘要
目的:探索指针疗法与功能训练治疗Bell’s面瘫的临床效果。方法:按病人就诊顺序将111例Bell’s面瘫患者分为试验组(57例)和对照组(54例),试验组采用指针疗法、功能训练、药物、物理治疗;对照组采用针刺疗法、功能训练、药物、物理治疗。两组治疗前、后均采用Portmann简易评分法评价疗效。结果:治疗前评分试验组(2.597±1.678),对照组(2.907±1.794),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后评分试验组(18.404±1.374),对照组(18.593±1.743),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);面肌功能改善指数试验组(0.859±0.090),对照组(0.844±0.095),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:指针疗法与针刺疗法治疗Bell’s面瘫疗效比较差异无统计学意义,二者均有明显的康复疗效;而指针疗法更具有操作简便,无疼痛、无创伤、无晕针症也无交叉感染的优势,避免了许多不利因素,使患者有较好的依从性。
Objective：To research the clinical effect of acupuncture therapy with finger and functional exercise to treat Bell＇s paralysis.Methods：111patients with Bell＇s paralysis were divided into two groups by the sequence of visit（trial group 57cases and control group 54 cases）.Patients in trial group were treated with acupuncture therapy with finger,functional exercise and physiotherapy,while patients in control group were treated with acupuncture,functional exercise and physiotherapy.The results of both groups were evaluated according to Portmann＇s Simple Scale.Results：The scores before treatment of trial group is 2.597±1.678,while control group is2.907±1.794.There is no significant statistic difference in these two groups（P〉0.05）.And the scores after treatment of trial group is 18.404±1.374,while control group is 18.593±1.743.The improvement index score of the function of facial muscles obtained from trial group is 0.859±0.090,while control group is 0.844±0.095.There is no significant statistic difference in these two groups（P〉0.05）.Conclusion：There is no significant statistic difference between these two groups.The clinical effect of both trial group and control group is obvious.But the acupuncture therapy with finger is more convenient,and there is no danger of faint or across infection.So the compliance of the patients is good.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2008年第1期80-81,共2页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
Bell’s面瘫
指针疗法
功能训练
Bell＇s paralysis,the acupuncture therapy with finger,Functional exercise
作者简介
王晓红（1951-），女，四川大邑人．副教授。
通讯作者：韩梅
