期刊文献+

中国版脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表的信度与效度研究 被引量:38

Reliability and validity of the brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese stroke patients
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验中国版脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表的信度与效度。方法:30例连续住院的脑卒中患者,按照中国版脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和Barthel指数(BI)的评分规则进行评定。效度研究采用结构效度和校标效度的方法,信度研究采用重测信度、评测者间信度和内部一致性的分析方法。重测信度和评测者间的信度检验用Kappa相关;内容一致性检验用Cronbachα值分析;校标效度用Spearman相关,判断中国脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和Barthel指数(BI)的相关性。结果:中国版脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表的四个成分中,身体功能、身体结构以及活动和参与成分的Kappa系数均在0.82—1.00之间,具有良好重测信度和评定者间信度。环境因素的Kappa系数稍低,在0.614-0.984之间,具有充分重测信度和评定者间信度。身体功能、活动和参与和环境因素三个成分都有很好的内容一致性,α值在0.779—0.970之间,身体结构成分因只有一个类目,不能计算α值。身体功能和活动和参与成分与BI和NIHSS间存在共同效度(r>0.7)。结论:采用中国版脑卒中简明ICF核心要素量表评定脑卒中患者的功能是可靠的、有效的,但这一结果的普适性尚需进一步检验。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese stroke patients. Method:Thirty consecutive stroke patients were measured with brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese stroke patients,the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Barthel Index (BI). The test-retest reliability,interater reliability and internal consistency were analyzed using Kappa correlation and Cronbach ct coefficients. The construct validity and standard validity were analyzed with Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Result:The brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese stroke patients had very good test-retest reliability and interater reliability (Kappa 0.82-1.00) with components of body function,body structure and activity and participation. The test-retest reliability and interater reliability for environment factor were also good as reflected by Kappa coefficients of from 0.614 to 0.984. The body function, activity and participation and environment factor had good internal consistency (α = 0.779-0.970). The Cronbach α coefficients for body structure could not be calculated, because there was only one item with this component. There was concurrent validity existed for the ICF components of body function and activity and participation with BI and NIHSS. Conclusion:The brief ICF Core Sets for Chinese stroke patients has good reliability and validity, but it is necessary to test the generality of this result.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期700-703,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 脑卒中 国际功能、残疾和健康分类 核心要素 信度 效度 stroke International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set reliability validity
作者简介 郭铁成,男,副主任医师 现工作单位:福建医科大学医学技术与工程学院康复治疗学系 现工作单位:中山大学附属第三医院康复医学科
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈君,李泽兵.改良版临床结局变化量表的有效性研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(11):820-823. 被引量:8
  • 2刘新通,王丽娟,汪萍,刘智.肉毒素A及康复训练联合治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006,28(10):712-714. 被引量:11
  • 3南登崑,主编.康复医学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.164.
  • 4Jφrgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 1: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1995,76: 399-405.
  • 5Studenski S,Duncan PW,Perera S,et al. Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke surviors [J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(8): 1746-1770.
  • 6Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2004, (44 Suppl):135-141.
  • 7Cieza A, Ewert T, Usttin TB,et al. Development of ICF core sets for patient with chronic conditions [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2004,(44 Suppl): 9-11.
  • 8Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2001,23(13): 559-569.
  • 9Robinson RG, Schultz SK, Castillo C, et al. Nortriptyline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of depression and in shortterm recovery after stroke: a placebo- controlled, double-blind study[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2000,157(3):351-359.
  • 10Evans RL, Connis RT, Bishop DS, et al. Stroke: a family dilemma[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 1994,16(3):110-118.

共引文献15

同被引文献428

引证文献38

二级引证文献277

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部