期刊文献+

广州市传染性非典型肺炎预警监测试点的评价

Evaluation on the Trial Prospective Surveillance of SARS in Guangzhou
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的描述广州市传染性非典型肺炎早期预警监测试点的运作情况,探索并评价监测方案的敏感性和可行性。方法收集两间试点医院的监测数据并运用SPSS进行描述性统计分析,主要包括区间估计、相关分析和wilcoxon非参数检验。结果两个试点在监测期间(2003年12月至2004年1月)的发热呼吸道病例数占监测科室病例总数比例的95%容许区间(单侧)分别为(0,1.36%)和(0,0.51%),发热肺炎病例数占监测科室病例总数比例的95%容许区间(单侧)分别为(0,0.42%)和(0,0.28%);预警病例数占发热肺炎病例的12.98%,占监测科室门诊病例总数的0.20‰;预警病例从发病到隔离治疗间隔时间平均为4.8 d。发热呼吸道病例主要就诊于监测试点医院的发热门诊和内科急诊。结论以科学选择的预警监测点为基础来建立的高度敏感预警监测系统对早期控制传染性非典型肺炎的传播和蔓延有重要作用,但应与其他监测系统资源的进行整合,既可以降低系统运行成本,又能提高系统的敏感性和特异性。 Objective To describe the implementation of the trial prospective surveillance of SARS in Guangzhou, and to evaluate its sensitivity and feasibility. Method Data from the two trial hospitals was collected and the statistical analysis was done by SPSS including interval estimate, correlation analysis and wilcoxon analysis. Result From December 2003 to January 2004, as to the daily number of outpatients in sentinel clinics of the two trial hospitals, the average proportion of hectic respiratory cases were 0.74 [95% CI (0, 1.36)] and 0.36 [95% CI (0,0.51)], while that of hectic pneumonia cases were 0.27 [95% CI (0,0.42)] and 0.18 [95% CI(0,0.28)]. The proportion of indicating cases is 12.98% among hectic pneumonia cases and 0.20% among outpatients. The average interval between disease onset and treatment of indicating cases is 4.8 days. In addition, the hectic respiratory cases usually referred to the hectic outpatient clinic and the emergency physical clinic. Conclusion Establishment of active prospective surveillance on valid sites is of great importance for the SARS control and prevention. The system should cooperation with other relevant surveillance to reduce the cost and raise the sensitivity and specificity.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2008年第6期610-612,共3页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
关键词 传染性非典型肺炎 预警监测 试点 预警病例 评价 SARS prospective surveillance trial indicating case evaluation
作者简介 秦鹏哲(1974-),男,主管医师,主要从事流行病和健康教育工作。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1So sin DM. Draft framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems [J].J Urban Health, 2003,80 (2Suppl 1): 8-13
  • 2Lazarus R, Kleinman K, Dashevsky I, et al. Use of automated ambulatory-care encounter records for detection of acute illness clusters, including potential bioterrorism events[J]. Emerge Infect Dis, 2002,8:753-760
  • 3Osaka K, Takahashi H, Ohyama T. Testing a symptom-based surveillance in high profile gatherings as a preparatory measure for bioterrorism [J]. Epidemiol Infect,2002, 129:429-434
  • 4Guillemin J.Anthrax:the investigation of a deadly outbreak[J].N Engl J Med,2000,343(16):1198.
  • 5Sosin DM.Draft framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems[J].J Urban Health,2003,80 (2 Suppl 1):i8-i13.
  • 6Mostashari F,Hartman J.Syndromic surveillance:a local perspective[J].J Urban Health,2003,80(2 Suppl 1):i1-i7.
  • 7Tsui FC,Wagner MM,Dato V,et al.Value of ICD-9 coded chief complaints for detection of epidemics[J].Proc AMIA Symp,2001:711-715.
  • 8Wang LM,Chen YC,Tung SP,et al.The rationale of fever surveillance to identify patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Taiwan[J].Emerg Med J,2006,23(3):202-205.
  • 9Lazarus R,Kleinman KP,Dashevsky I,et al.Using automated medical records for rapid identification of illness syndromes(syndromic surveillance):the example of lower respiratory infection[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2001,1∶9.Epub 2001 Oct 22.
  • 10Sloane PD,MacFarqubar JK,Sickbert-Bennett E,et al.Syndromic surveillance for emerging infections in office practice using billing data[J].Annals of Family Medicine,2006,4(4):351-358.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部