期刊文献+

“核心讨论组”方法在残疾人生存质量构成领域研究中的应用 被引量:3

The Use of Focus Group Discussion in Studying the Dimensions and the Facets of QOL for People with Disability
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:使用"核心讨论组"方法探讨中国残疾人生存质量的构成领域和方面。方法:广州地区39名残疾人、照顾者及医护人员按照不同类型分为7个讨论组,使用半结构化的形式开展核心讨论,进行书面记录和录音,并使用定性分析方法对材料进行分析。结果:残疾人的生存质量主要包含15个方面,组成5个领域:生理(包含生理功能、残疾程度)、心理(包含精神状况、能力、自尊)、社会关系(包含人际关系、社会支持)、环境(包含居住环境、无障碍设施/辅助器械、经济状况、娱乐休闲)和社会参与领域(包含就业、教育/保障制度、尊重接纳、歧视嘲笑)。结论:残疾人生存质量的15个构成方面跟普通人的大致相同,区别在于残疾人还重视残疾程度、无障碍设施/辅助器械、教育/保障制度。核心讨论组作为一种有效的访谈法可以作为一种有效的研究残疾人生存质量的工具,有助于构建评估残疾人生存质量量表的领域和方面。 Objective: To understand the dimensions and the facets of QOL for people with disability.Methods: 39 people including people with disability,carers and medical staff who provided care in Guangzhou were divided into seven focus groups.Each group was interviewed in a semi-structured form.Audio record and written notes were used and these materials were analyzed by qualitative data analysis methods.Results:The study yielded 15 QOL domains grouped into 5 dimensions: physical health(physical functioning,severity of disability),psychological health(mental health,ability, self-esteem),social function(interpersonal relationship,social support),environment(inhabitancy,barrier-free facilities/assistive devices,financial situation,entertainment and recreation),social participation(employment,education/social security,acceptance and respect,discrimination).Conclusions:15 facets in QOL scale for people with disability were almost similar to those for normal people.The difference was that people with disability paid attention to severity of disability,barrier-free facilities/assistive devices,and education/social security.The focus group discussion is an effective qualitative interview technique which can be a practical method of studying quality of life for people with disability,and it can help to evaluate the dimensions and the facets of QOL for people with disability.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期465-468,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 欧盟第六个研究框架计划项目(DIS-QOL)(编号:SP23-CT-2005-513723)
关键词 核心讨论组 残疾人 生存质量 领域 方面 focus group discussion people with disability quality of life dimension facet
作者简介 通讯作者 通讯作者
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王子舟,夏凡.图书馆如何对残疾人实施知识援助[J].图书情报知识,2007,24(2):5-18. 被引量:56
  • 2Davies A, Souza LHD, Fran AO. Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disabil Rehabil, 2003, 25 (6) : 286 - 290.
  • 3Lintern TC, Beaumont JG, Kenealy PM, et al. quality of life (QOL) in severely disabled muhiple sclerosis patients: comparison of three QOL measures using multidi- mensional scaling. Qual Life Res, 2001, 10:371 -378.
  • 4Baars RM, Atherton CI, Koopman HM, et al. The European DISABKIDS project: development of seven condition-specific modules to measure health related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2005, 3 : 70 - 78.
  • 5Sharts-Hopko NC. Focus Group Methodology: When and Why? J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care, 2001, 12 (4) : 89 - 91.
  • 6Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2000:2-8.
  • 7Nwoye MI. A focus group discussion approach to the comparative analysis of private and public sector enterprises in Nigeria. Technovation, 2002, 22 : 525 - 534.
  • 8Weinger K, O'donnell KA, Ritholz MD. Adolescent Views of Diabetes-Related Parent Conflict and Support : A Focus Group Analysis. J Adolesc Health, 2001, 29:330 - 336.
  • 9郝元涛,方积乾.世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表中文版介绍及其使用说明[J].现代康复,2000,4(8):1127-1129. 被引量:1828
  • 10Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1984: 1-25.

二级参考文献38

共引文献1881

同被引文献38

  • 1郑曦.大学生残疾人态度量表测评[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(9):772-773. 被引量:8
  • 2白文飞.体育锻炼行为阶段改变模式理论的综述[J].首都体育学院学报,2006,18(3):46-48. 被引量:24
  • 3中华人民共和国残疾人保障法.2008-07-01.
  • 4Lippert-Grüner M,Maegele M,Haverkamp H,et al.Health-related quality of life during the first year after severe brain trauma with and without polytrauma.Brain Inj.2007;21(5):451-455.
  • 5Arehart E,Gleim S,Kasza Z,et al.Prostacyclin,atherothrombosis,and cardiovascular disease.Curr Med Chem.2007;14(20):2161-2169.
  • 6The Netherlands Cancer Institute,Amsterdam.Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments:attributes and review criteria.Qual Life Res.2002;11(3):193-205.
  • 7Guillemin F,Bombardier C,Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures:literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol.1993;46(12):1417-1432.
  • 8Acquadro C,Conway K,Hareendran A,et al.Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials.Value Health.2008;11(3):509-521.
  • 9Osburn HG.Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.Psychol Methods.2000;5(3):343-355.
  • 10Browne MW,Cudeck R.Alternative ways of assessing model fit.In:Bollen KA,Long JS,eds、 Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park (Calif):Sage.1993:136-162.

引证文献3

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部