摘要
目的探讨新生儿疾病筛查中2种不同采血方法的效能差异。方法将我院出生的264例新生儿,按采血卡片编号随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组用39~41℃温水浸泡脚5~8 min,对照组用39~41℃温水浸透毛巾拧干捂脚数下5~8 min后足底定位采血法采血。结果实验组采血所需时间（8.50±2.10）min,一针采血成功率83%,一级片占85%,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论温水泡足采血组具有所需时间短、效率高、一针采血成功率高、血片质优准确等优点。
Objective To investigate the effect difference of two different blood collecting methods in screening of neonatal diseases. Methods 264 newborns were randomly divided into the test group and the control group according to the number of blood collecting cards. In the test group, the foot of newborns were soaked in the warm water at about 39-41℃ for 5--8 rain, otherwise the foot of newborns in the control group were just warmed with towel for 5-8 mln which was immersed in the warm water with the temperature of 39-41℃ and wrung out. Then blood was collected by thenar lancing phlebotomy. Results In the test group, the blood collection time was 8. 50!2. 10 min, the successful rate for lhe first time of blood collection was 83% （109/132）, grade A blood smear accounted for 85% （112/132）. There was a remarkable difference between the two groups （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusions It has advantages of short time, high efficiency, high rate for the first time of blood collection, good and exact blood smear that the foot of newborn are soaked in the warm water hefore the blood collection.
出处
《现代护理》
2008年第5期573-574,共2页
Modern Nursing
关键词
足底定位采血
新生儿疾病筛查
温水浸泡
效率
Thenar lancing phlebotomy
Neonatal screening
Soak in the warm water
Efficiency
作者简介
陧玲，女，1970年出生，本科，主管护师，护理部干事。
