期刊文献+

基于故障树分析的航空电子系统BIT诊断策略设计 被引量:8

Built-in Test Diagnosis Strategy Design Based on Fault Tree Analysis for Avionic System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决故障搜索时的多径问题,以故障树模型为基础,综合考虑可靠性和测试费用等因素提出了一种航空电子系统BIT诊断策略设计新方法;引入费用诊断重要度(CDIF)来衡量测试费用对BIT故障诊断的影响,利用二元决策图对故障树进行定性和定量分析,据此构建出基于最小割集和CDIF的BIT诊断决策树;在某型机载INS/GPS组合导航系统BIT设计中的应用验证了该方法的有效性与实用性,与基于AO*搜索和基于贪婪算法的两种诊断策略设计方法比较可知该方法的计算复杂度更小。 To solve the muhi--path problem in fauh source searching, a new method for designing BIT fault diagnosis strategy for corn plex avionic systems, consideriug reliability and testing cosls, is proposed based on fault tree model, The costs and diagnostic importance factor (CDIF) is introduced to evaluate the influences whicb the test costs have on the BIT diagnosis, and binary decision diagram (BDD) is ap plied to analyze the fault tree qualitatively and quantitatively, and consequently, the BIT diagnostic decision tree is built based on minimal cut sets and CDIF. The application of BIT design in a certain INS/GPS integrated navigation system demonstrates its engineering practicability and validity, and the comparisons with the two other BIT diagnosis strategy design methods which are respectively based on AO* algorithm and greed algorithm show the method is better on the aspects of average diagnostic cost and computational complexity.
出处 《计算机测量与控制》 CSCD 2008年第1期12-16,共5页 Computer Measurement &Control
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60572173) 航天创新基金资助项目(2004CH01001) 西北工业大学青年科技创新基金资助项目(M016217) 西北工业大学研究生创业种子基金资助项目(Z2004001)
关键词 故障树 测试费用 航窄电子系统 BIT故障诊断 二元决策图 诊断决策树 fault tree testing costs avionic system BIT fauh diagnosis binary decision diagram diagnostic decision tree
作者简介 张超(1977-),男,湖北枝江人,讲师,主要从事自动化测试和故障诊断方向的研究。 马存宝(1963-),陕西三原人,教授,主要从事自动化测试和故障诊断等方向的研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Savir J. Built-in online and offline test of airbome digital systems L 2. IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement. 2005, 54(3) : 965--974.
  • 2张超,马存宝,宋东,许家栋.智能机内测试研究综述[J].计算机测量与控制,2007,15(2):141-144. 被引量:15
  • 3宋东,马存宝,石贤敏,李红娟,张天伟.飞行管理计算机自动测试系统设计[J].测控技术,2002,21(7):34-36. 被引量:1
  • 4张超,马存宝,胡云兰,许家栋.基于BDD的关联故障树定量分析法研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,41(10):62-63. 被引量:6
  • 5闵苹,童节娟,奚树人.利用二元决策图求解故障树的基本事件排序[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1646-1649. 被引量:26
  • 6Jung W S, Han S H, Ha J. A fast BDD algorithm for large coherent fault trees analysis [J]. Reliability engineering and system safety, 2004, 83 (3): 369--374.
  • 7Remenyte R,Andrews J D. A simple component connection approach for fault tree conversion to binary decision diagram [A].Proceedings of the first international conference on availability, reliability and security[C]. 2006, 449-456.
  • 8Sinnamon R M . Andrews J D. Improved accuracy in quantitative fault tree analysis[J]. Quality and Reliability Eigineering International. 1997. 13:285-295.
  • 9Assaf T,Dugan J B. Automatic generation of diagnosis expert systems from faull trees[A]. Proceeding of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium [C].2003, 143-147.
  • 10Rauzy A. Efficient algorithms to assess component and gate importance in fault tree analysis [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 9 999 72:213-222.

二级参考文献35

  • 1张超,马存宝,胡云兰,许家栋.基于BDD的关联故障树定量分析法研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,41(10):62-63. 被引量:6
  • 2张腾飞,王锡淮,叶银忠,肖健梅.粗糙集理论在故障诊断中的应用综述[J].上海海事大学学报,2005,26(4):20-25. 被引量:15
  • 3李为民 李向东 等.VXI总线测试平台技术[M].电子科技大学出版社,1996..
  • 4Karen A R,Andrews J D.A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2002;78:45~56.
  • 5Sinnamon R M,Andrews J D.Improved Accuracy in Quantitative Fault Tree analysis[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,1997; 13: 285~292.
  • 6Jung W S,Han S H,Ha J.A fast BDD algorithm for large coherent fault tree analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2004;83:369~374.
  • 7Bryant R E.Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation [J].IEEE Trans on Computers,1986,C-35:677-691.
  • 8Akers S B.Binary decision diagrams [J].IEEE Trans on Computers,1978,C-27:509-516.
  • 9Sinnamon R M,Andrews J D.Fault tree analysis and binary decision diagrams [A].Proc RAMS'96 Conf [C].Las Vegas,Nevada,1996.215-222.
  • 10Bartlett L M,Andrews J D.An ordering heuristic to develop the binary decision diagram based on structural importance [J].Reliability Eng and Syst Safety,2001,72:31-38.

共引文献43

同被引文献43

  • 1韩邦华,吴慧媛.基于故障树的主风机失效分析[J].机械设计与制造,2005(4):19-21. 被引量:4
  • 2周长林,常青美,左秀彦,周琪.电子设备可靠性预测与设计[J].继电器,2005,33(14):92-95. 被引量:19
  • 3杨智勇,许化龙,许爱强.基于多信号模型的故障诊断策略设计[J].计算机测量与控制,2006,14(12):1616-1619. 被引量:37
  • 4孙红梅,高齐圣,朴营国.关于故障树分析中几种典型重要度的研究[J].电子产品可靠性与环境试验,2007,25(2):39-42. 被引量:38
  • 5张宏伟 李志强 都学新.现代电子产品BIT设计研究.现代电子产品,2001,(8).
  • 6W. R. Simpson, J. W. shephard. System Test and Diagnosis[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994: 65-86.
  • 7Simpson W R, Shephard J W. System Testability Assessment for Integrated Diagnostics (part 3) [J].IEEE Design &Test of Computers, 1992, 9 (1): 40-54.
  • 8王栋,等.基于信息流模型的测试优选方法[C].2007年全国博士生论坛同济大学控制分论坛论文集,2007.
  • 9Wang dong, ehen shengjian An Optimized Algorithm Based on Information Entropy for System- Level Fault Isolation Strategy [A]. ICEMI' 07[C].
  • 10Shephard J. W. and Simpson W. R. , Performing Effective Fault Isolation in Integrated Diagnostics (part6) [J]. IEEE Design & Test of Computers, June. 1993: 78-89.

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部