期刊文献+

简析庄子的“彼此是非”论及生死观

Some Ideas about Zhuang Zi's Theory of "Each Other's Right and Wrong" and His Death-Life Outlook
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 《庄子.齐物论》中"彼此是非"一节,历来论者多从认识论的角度分析,且由于此段话在文字辩正方面存在较多问题,遂造成种种误解。该文认为庄子这里是在本体论意义上谈"彼此是非",因此对此段话作了逐字逐句的考辨,以期形成对它的准确认识。庄子"彼此是非"的思想最出色的运用表现在其生死观上,他并不是一味地将生死等同起来,而是在看到异中之同时,也看到同中之异,其心态和思想十分复杂,从而能够更深刻地体味人和他所在的那个世界的关系。 The scholars always analyze the section of "each other's right and wrong"in On Material Identity by Zhuang zi from the angle of cognitive theory. Owing to the different explanation to this section, misunderstanding appears one after another. This paper holds that Zhuang Zi talks about each other' s right and wrong on the basis of noumenon, and also explains the passage word for word, hoping to have an exact reading to it. The best application of Zhuang Zi to each other's right and wrong is shown in life-death identically, but tries to see the difference from similarity and vice versa with comphcated ideas, thus tasts deeply the relation of man and his relation with the world he lives in.
作者 黄忠晶
出处 《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2007年第6期32-35,共4页 Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 庄子 彼此 是非 生死 Zhuang Zi each other right and wrong life and death
作者简介 黄忠晶(1949-),男,江苏沛县人,江南大学法政学院教授、硕士生导师,主要从事社会学、哲学、社会思想史等方面的研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献7

  • 1王夫之.《庄子解》[M].中华书局,1981年版.第246页.
  • 2Things, Theories - Sorting Themselves. Wu Kuang- ming. The Butterfly as Companion. Meditations on the first three Chapters of the Chuang Tzu. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.1
  • 3成玄英.《庄子序》,《庄子集释》.
  • 4郭庆藩辑.《新编诸子集成》本.第一册,第7页。北京,中华书局,1982年版.
  • 5Benjamin I. Schwartz, The World of Thought in Ancient China. 《Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1985》, pp. 215-216.
  • 6杨柳桥.《庄子译诂》,上海古籍出版社,1994年版,第23页.
  • 7任继愈.《庄子探源之一》,《中国哲学史论》,上海人民出版社,1981年版,第261页.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部