期刊文献+

帽儿山地区不同类型河岸带土壤的反硝化效率 被引量:15

Soil denitrification rates in different type riparian zones in Maoershan mountainous region of China.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以帽儿山地区森林背景下的森林、皆伐、草地河岸带和农田背景下的森林、裸地河岸带土壤为研究对象,采用硝态氮消失法,研究了不同背景下各类型河岸带的反硝化强度及其影响因素.结果表明:各类型河岸带中,农田背景下的森林河岸带土壤反硝化强度最大,其硝态氮消失率的变化范围为46.79%~91.13%,农田背景下的裸地河岸带土壤反硝化强度最小,其硝态氮消失率的变化范围为15.64%~81.84%;森林背景下土壤反硝化强度的大小顺序为皆伐河岸带〉森林河岸带〉草地河岸带,其硝态氮消失率的变化范围依次为42.06%~90.39%、28.24%~85.73%、21.44%~83.11%.研究区河岸带表层土壤的反硝化强度大于底层.河岸带土壤反硝化强度均受可利用碳、硝态氮的限制,各类型河岸带以农田背景下森林河岸带土壤反硝化潜力最大. Soil samples were collected from forested, clear-cut, and grassy riparian zones under forest background and from forested and barren riparian zones under cropland background in the Maoershan mountainous region of China. The samples were incubated in laboratory, and their denitrification potentials were determined by nitrate-deduction method. The results showed that under cropland background, soil denitrification rate was the highest in forested riparian zone and the lowest in barren riparian zone, with the deduction rate of nitrate varied from 46.79%-91.13% and 15.64% -81.84%, respectively. Under forest background, soil denitrification rate decreased in the order of clearcut 〉 forested 〉 grassy riparian zone, with the deduction rate of nitrate being 42.06%- 90.39%, 28.24%-85.73% and 21.44%-83.11%, respectively. The denitrification rate was higher in subsurface layer than in deeper layer, and the denitrification potential was limited by the available carbon and nitrate, being the greatest in the forested riparian zone under cropland background.
机构地区 东北林业大学
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期2681-2686,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30370277).
关键词 河岸带 森林 农田 土壤 反硝化 riparian zone forest cropland soil denitrification
作者简介 王庆成,男,1963年生,博士,教授.主要从事森林培育、森林生态学方面的研究,发表论文30余篇.E-mail:wqcnefu@163.com,通讯作者.E-mail:wqcnefu@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Bao S-T (鲍士旦). 2000. Soil Agro-Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House
  • 2Beck H, Christensen S. 1987. The effect of grass maturing and root decay on nitrous oxide production in soil. Plant and Soil, 103 : 269-273
  • 3陈伏生,曾德慧,何兴元.森林土壤氮素的转化与循环[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(5):126-133. 被引量:108
  • 4邓红兵,王青春,王庆礼,吴文春,邵国凡.河岸植被缓冲带与河岸带管理[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):951-954. 被引量:236
  • 5Drury CF, Beauchamp EG. 1991. Ammonium fixation, release, nitrification, and immobilization in high-and low-fixing soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55 : 125-129
  • 6Dupont DP. 1992. Economic assessment of the performance of alternative environmental policy instruments as they pertain to agriculture and water quality// Miller MH, FitzGibbon JE, Fox GC, eds. Agriculture and Water Quality: Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium. Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph
  • 7贺缠生,傅伯杰,陈利顶.非点源污染的管理及控制[J].环境科学,1998,19(5):87-91. 被引量:401
  • 8He N-Z(何念祖),Meng C-F(孟赐福).1987.Principles for Plant Nutrition.Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press
  • 9Hernandez ME, Mitsch WJ. 2007. Denitrification potential and organic matter as affected by vegetation community, wetland age, and plant introduction in created wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36: 333- 342
  • 10Hill AR. 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones.Journal of Environmental Quality, 25 : 743-755

二级参考文献293

共引文献1402

同被引文献301

引证文献15

二级引证文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部