摘要
对于疑罪案件,绝大多数国家都根据无罪推定和疑罪从无原则予以不诉。疑罪不诉的实体要件在于"证据不足",即有证据证明犯罪嫌疑人有犯罪嫌疑,但经过侦查和补充侦查,全案的证据仍未达到提起公诉所要求的证据确实充分的程度,不能形成严密的证据锁链。在对"证据不足"的把握上,应以基本事实和基本证据为基准,突出对证据能力和证明力的审查判断,并注意各种案件和各类证据的内在差异,予以区别对待。
For the cases of suspected crime ,most countries take the policy of non-prosecution on the basis of the priinciple of presumption of innocence.The ibjective requsite of such non-prosecution is ＂insufficient evidence＂,which means there is evidence for the suspicion,but still not enough to reach the needed legal degree even after the investigation and complementary investigation.The definition of ＂msuffucietn evidence＂should be based on fundamental truth and evidence.It＇s very important ro examine the weigth of proof and the credibility of evidence.Meanwhile ,different cases and evidences should be treated differently too.
出处
《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第6期685-689,共5页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题(GJ2007D08)
安徽师范大学博士科研启动资金
关键词
疑罪
证据不足
区别对待
suspected crime
insufficient evidence
different treatment
作者简介
奚玮（1968-）男，安徽芜湖人，法学博士，副教授，硕士生导师，北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院博士后研究人员，中国政治大学法律应用研究中心研究员。
