摘要
文章力图解释中国农业集体化运动中抵制的相对缺失,与此相对照的苏联经验是,农业集体化遇到了远为巨大的社会抵制。这里分析了五个因素:土地改革的影响;创新性的阶级体制;社会控制体制;党的基层结构;合法化的话语。这些因素的分析显示,中国农村的"高潮"是一种组织的成功:组织者是密集、团结和有效的,被组织者是分散、从属和在空间上瘫痪的,通过指向群众动员成功的历史经验和象征性的话语,这二者很好地联结起来。
This paper tries to explain the relative lack of resistance during China＇s agricultural collectivization campaign, in contrast to the Soviet Union experience in which agricultural collectivization encountered much heavier social resistance. Five factors are analysed ： the effects of the Land Reform; the innovative class system; the social control system; the basic -level Party apparatus; the legitimizing discourse. Analyses of these factors reveal that the High Tide in rural China was an organizational success： the organizers were dense, cohesive and efficient, the organized were divided, dependent and spatially paralysed, and the two were well connected through historical experiences and symbolic discourse, all of which point to the success of mass mobilization.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期42-47,共6页
Modern Philosophy
作者简介
刘瑜，现为美国哈佛大学费正清东亚研究中心博士后。
罗嗣亮系中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所、哲学系博士研究生
