期刊文献+

中心静脉导管病原菌污染调查 被引量:72

Pathogens on Central Venous Catheter Tips:An Investigation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨中心静脉导管(CVC)的病原学特征。方法回顾分析近5年临床各科送检的CVC病原学结果及细菌耐药性。结果3189份CVC标本中471份(14.77%)检出致病菌514株,G+球菌、G-杆菌和真菌分别占42.41%、40.66%和16.93%;最常见的致病菌分别为表皮葡萄球菌(15.56%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(13.81%)、铜绿假单胞菌(13.23%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(7.59%)和鲍氏不动杆菌(6.23%);91.18%为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),88.57%为耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MRCNS),12.00%肠杆菌科产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs);44.12%铜绿假单胞菌和34.38%鲍氏不动杆菌全部耐药。结论CVC检出病原菌以耐药菌为主,应加强病原学监测及导管护理,是控制导管相关性感染的关键。 OBJECTIVE To investigate the characteristic of pathogens of central venous catheter(CVC). METHODS The pathogens of CVC from different departments and their drug-resistances were analyzed retrospectively in recent 5 years. RESULTS Totally 471 (14. 77;) of 3 189 samples were isolated with 514 strains of microorganisms, of which G^+ bacteria accounted for 42. 41;, G^- bacteria 40.66;, and yeasts 16. 93;. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus epidermidis ( 15. 56;), S. aureus ( 13. 81;), Pseudomonas aeruglnosa ( 13. 23 ;), Klebsiella pneumoniae ( 7. 59 ;) and Acinetobacter baumannii ( 6. 23; ), respectively. 91.18; of S. aureus were MRSA, 88. 57; of S. epidermidls were MRCNS and 12; of Enterobacter were ESBLs. 44.12; of P. areuglnosa and 34.38; of A. baumannii were pan-drug resistant. CONCLUSIONS The most commonly encountered pathogens of CVC are almost drug-resistant, the organism monitoring and the medical attendance of catheters should be enforced.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第7期819-821,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 中心静脉导管 病原菌 调查 Central venous catheter Pathogen Investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献26

  • 1邹英,府伟灵.细菌培养诊断静脉插管相关性菌血症[J].中华检验医学杂志,1993,16(5):298-300.
  • 2[1]Maki DG, Gobb L, Garman JK, et al. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for the prevention of infection with central venous catheters: a prospective randomized multicenter trial[J]. Am J Med, 1988, 85(3): 307-314.
  • 3[4]Kite P, Dobbins BM, Wilcox MH, et al. Rapid diagnosis of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal[J]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9189): 1504-1507.
  • 4[5]Rushforth JA, Hoy CM, Kite P, et al. Rapid diagnosis of central venous catheter sepsis[J]. Lancet, 1993, 342(8868): 402-403.
  • 5[6]Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection[J]. N Engl J Med, 1977, 296(23): 1305.
  • 6[9]Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHEⅡ: a severity of disease classification system[J]. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13(10): 818-819.
  • 7[10]von-Baum H, Philippi P, Geiss HK. Acridine-orange leucocyte cytospin (AOLC) test as an in-situ method for the diagnosis of central venous catheter (CVC)-related sepsis in adult risk patients[J]. Zentralbl Bakteriol, 1998, 287(1-2): 117-123.
  • 8[11]Crump JA, Collognon PJ. Intravascular catheter-associated infections[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2000, 19(1): 1-8.
  • 9Brun-buisson C, Abrar F, Legrand P, et al. Diagnosis of central venous catheter related sepsis.Critical level of quantitative tip cultures[J]. Arch Interm Med, 1987, 147: 873-877
  • 10Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG, et al. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary artery catheters[J]. N Engl J Med, 1992, 327: 1062-1068

共引文献239

同被引文献488

引证文献72

二级引证文献454

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部