摘要
传统观点认为,一裁终局是仲裁相对于诉讼的主要优点之一。但随着国际商事交往规模的日益扩大,一裁终局在国际商事仲裁领域内除了效率性结果外,还带来了公正性缺失的可能性,并且现行的司法审查制度也不能从根本上消除这一问题。因此,应当将商事仲裁视为主要是契约因素与裁决权威性因素的结合,增设当事人协议进行的"二次仲裁",同时,尽可能回退司法因素,以利于仲裁的发展。
A traditional view holds that one of the advantages of arbitrament as opposed to lawsuit is final ruling of primary arbitrament. However, along with the increasingly enlarged scale of international commercial activities, this advantage entails, besides its efficiency, possibility of fairness deficiency, which the existent judicial review system cannot eliminate fundamental- ly. Therefore, it is a must to regard commercial arbitrament principally as a combination between contractual factors and arbitrating authority factors, to set up "secondary arbitrament" of involved parties bargaining, and for the arbitrament to turn to judicial factors with the chief goal of facilitating its development.
出处
《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期15-20,共6页
Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
国际商事仲裁
一裁终局
二次仲裁
契约因素
司法因素
裁决权威性因素
international commercial arbitrament
final ruling of primary arbitrament
secondary arbitrament
judicial factors
arbitrating authority factors
作者简介
孟昭华(1980-),女,黑龙江佳木斯人,教师,西南政法大学国际法硕士研究生。