期刊文献+

个体决策非理性行为的实验验证 被引量:1

The experiment of irrational behavior in individual decision-making
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 前景理论对基于个体理性的期望效用最大化决策原则提出了批判,该理论认为,不确定性条件下的个体决策存在框架效应、参考点和确定性效应等非理性行为。对120名大学生实验参加者进行了实验室实验,实验结果表明,不确定性条件下的个体决策存在风险态度的差异,这种差异表明个体的决策过程并不单纯是由期望效用所驱使,还受多种心理因素的影响,实验结果验证了个体决策过程中框架效应、参考点和确定性效应等非理性心理特征的存在。 Prospect theory has challenged the decision-making principle of expected utility maximization which based on rationality. According to the prospect theory, there are some irrational such as frame effect, reference point and cer-tainty effect in individual decision making under uncertainty. 120 undergraduates are made the subjects of the laboratory experiment, the experiment showing that the attitudes to risk are different under uncertainty. The difference indicates the decision making of individual is not only prompted by expected utility, but also influenced by some psychological factors. There are some irrational psychological characteristics, such as the frame effect, reference point and certainty effect.
出处 《河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第2期14-15,18,共3页 Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词 个体决策 风险态度 非理性行为 实验 individual decision attitudes to risk irrational behavior experiment
作者简介 李占雷(1965-)男,河北深州人,教授,北京科技大学在读博士,研究方向:公司金融。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Neumann von J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.
  • 2Kahnemen, D, Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, (47) :263 -291.
  • 3李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2003.150—156.
  • 4Berg, J. E. , Daley, L. A. , Dickhout, J. W. , O' Brien, J. R. , 1986. Controlling preference for lotteries on units of experimental exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, ( 101 ) :282 - 06.

共引文献3

同被引文献9

  • 1Levin Irwin P,Sandra L.Schneider,Gary J.Gaeth.All Frames Are Not Created Equal:A Typology and CriticalAnalysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior andHuman Decision Processes . 1998
  • 2Scheufele,D.A.Agenda-setting,priming,and fram- ing revisited:Another look at cognitive effects of political communicaiton. Mass Communication &So- ciety . 2000
  • 3Kuhberger A.The influence of framing on risky decisions:A meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process . 1988
  • 4Jill A. Edy,Patrick C. Meirick.Wanted, Dead or Alive:Media Fr ames, Frame Adoption, and Support for the War in Afghanistan. Jou rnal of Communication . 2007
  • 5Dennis Chong,James N, Druckman.A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. Journal of Communicat ion . 2007
  • 6Zizi Papacharissi,Maria de Fatima Oliveira.News Frames Terroris m:A Comparative Analysis of Frames Employed in Terrorism Coverage in US and UK Newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics . 2008
  • 7Entman,Robert M.Framing:Toward Clarification of a Frac-tured Paradigm. Journal of Communication . 1993
  • 8Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science . 1981
  • 9张洪忠.大众传播学的议程设置理论与框架理论关系探讨[J].西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,22(10):88-91. 被引量:183

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部